• BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Let’s do some math:

    2.1GWh

    And

    Multi billion dollar price (let’s assume 3 billion)

    2.1GWh - > 3billion

    2.1MWh - > 3 millon

    2.1kWh - > 3000 Usd /2.1

    1KWh - > ~1430 USD

    Considering that 1kWh in lithium ion batteries is like 150 USD they aren’t getting a good value out of it.

    • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Short sighted math, you’ve completely ignored the battery chemistry. These batteries last longer & don’t degrade

      Also im sure that the team of engineers who worked on the decision to go with this battery know what they’re doing and have a better grasp of what makes economical sense than you do

      • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        team of engineers who worked on the decision

        You misspelled politicians. In case of the large scale project the decisions are made by politicians. And their goal isn’t exactly to spend money in optimal way. It’s to spend money on big flashy projects that win them votes.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m sorry you think a politician would think 1kwh billed at 1500 is a good idea because it involves a “big flashy” project?

          This isn’t Trump we’re talking about

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think the multibillion price tag is about the physical battery itself.

      It’s probably the cost of the entire project. Which includes:

      • Project management
      • Engineering
      • Digging the whole
      • Security
      • Maintainance
      • Environmental impact analysis (among many other analysis)
      • Reducing the environmental impact
      • Permits (and a LOT of bureaucracy)

      The list goes on. Notice how I didn’t even mention the battery itself.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Larger startup cost, but over the one power plant’s lifetime the Li batteries would wear out and have to be replaced many times.