You should know this because voter ID is one of the most debated topics in American politics, especially in recent years (SAVE America Act). On one hand, there’s election integrity, and on the other, voter access.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/46320788

Of these states, six have Democratic trifectas, 23 have Republican trifectas, and seven have divided governments. There are currently 14 states that do not require identification at the polls outside of what is required by federal law. Of these 14 states, 10 have Democratic trifectas, and four have a divided government.

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Rule 2. Please edit your post to start with “Why you should know”

    This post is locked until you message me that it is corrected. If not corrected in 24 hours this post will be removed.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Ffs you get mailed a voter I.D. card when you register. This is legally required as a federal precedent. Anything else is a poll tax and is illegal.

    You can use your drivers license, but an ID must be provided if required.

  • Dinglefluff@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You guys might not need to worry about this anymore… A fair election in the US at this point seems optimistic

    • roofuskit@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I would like to point out that statements like this can be used to stir up voter apathy which overwhelmingly benefits one party in the US.

      • Dinglefluff@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I would counter that ignoring statements like this leads to a different kind of apathy where people sit back and wait for a chance to vote out the dictator, letting him run rampant, and then act shocked when said vote does not get the dictator out.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      voting rights just got gutted, and lousiania already moving to invalidate elected positions, by eliminating it before the elect is seated.

  • CorneliusTalmadge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The thing that I never hear brought up about voter id, is that voter id + electronic voting means your vote is no longer anonymous.

    And in my opinion this is the real reason why they are pushing for it. How do improve your propaganda machine if you don’t know individual results. Let alone all the more sinister reasons this information would valuable to an authoritarian regime.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      As someone opposed to voter ID laws, how does voter ID remove anonymity when ballots are anonymous?

      • CorneliusTalmadge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        So I can’t say this is true for each “brand” of machine, however just from observing how it works where I vote.

        They scan your ID with the computer. This activates a key card. That key card is then inserted into the voting machine allowing a ballot to be cast.

        Even if you assume those records are not directly tied together. It would then be trivial for anyone with access to both data sets to just use time stamps to match the id scan to the time the ballot was submitted.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      voting machines have always been compromised, its not wonder gop states use them, they know the companies+russia will likely rig the machines.

  • nocturne@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Rule 2- In your post’s text body, you must include the reason “Why” YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content.

  • Mpatch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just don’t get it. Why wouldn’t you have to show I.D at a polling station?

    • roofuskit@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      IDs varies greatly in the US. They are not federal, they are not free, and the difficulty of obtaining the documents to get your ID often disproportionately affects poor people. In the US we banned poll taxes for many of the reasons people oppose these voter ID laws.

    • The2b@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because not everyone is capable of getting an ID. For one, they’re not free, so requiring one is effectively a voting tax, preventing the poorest of our community members from having a say in our government.

      Two, even if they were free monetarily, they’re not free to get in terms of time. If you’re working 16 hours a day at 2 jobs for example, when are you supposed to take time to go to the DMV to get an ID or license? This is particularly hard for, again, poorer people who have to work multiple jobs to stay afloat.

      Three, there really is no problem that requiring an ID at a polling station solves. Of the BILLIONS of votes in the Heritage Foundation’s (a VERY conservative thinktank, the one Trump tapped for most of his judicial nominations) database recording voter fraud events, they have a little more than 1000 instances of SUSPECTED voter fraud. That’s about 0.0001% of votes cast are suspected to be fraudulent by the people trying to push the policy to correct the problem.

      Meanwhile, these laws prevent more people from voting legally each election than have ever been suspected of voting fraudulantly since we have been keeping records. They are doing research to find the specific forms of IDs the people who vote against them tend to have or not have, and explicitly targetting them to ensure as few votes against them are allowed to be cast. It is an inheirently undemocratic solution to a problem which the proponents of the policy openly state does not exist.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I voted for a couple decades by just saying my name and having it crossed off the list, and back then the rate of voter fraud was basically zero just like it is after adding a barrier that keeps some people from voting.

      Voter ID laws only exist to make it harder for poor people and minorities to vote.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        there was fraud, but its mostly on the REPUBLICAN side or caused by republicans, and funny how it never gets reported. just like the election autopsy isnt getting reported because they dont want it released, granted the dnc doesnt want it to get released.

      • SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        voter fraud was zero

        you have no way to know given what you describe

        poor and minoritiesdo they not have IDs in freedomland?

        • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          The zero thing was hyperbole, but there are numbers available. Voter fraud has never been significant enough to matter, despite being non zero.

          And no, not everyone can obtain the mandated IDs. It’s a real problem specifically because the mandated IDs are harder to get for the poor amd disenfranchised.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      its a method of voter suppression , and only every gop used it thats why. its a burdensome fee, and not many people, mainly AA people can get one right away. likely you will have to show 2 or more proofs of CITIZENSHIP, which can be difficult for most people and LICENSES dont count. valid passports, certificate of naturalization, birth certificate is actually quite difficult to get. for passports only some places have the option to apply one, USPS and then you have to book appointments too, which can be booked weeks to months in advance.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Shouldn’t the logic be the other way? Why would you need to?

      I’ve never had to do this and there’s never been an issue so it seems like a solution in search of a problem to me.

      • Starya67@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        In plenty of countries, you have to bring ID when you vote. Many also require you to have ID (and in the Netherlands you have to have it with you at all times).

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Right?

      The things that require ID: starting a job, buying beer, buying cigarettes, using government services, using healthcare services, etc, etc.

      I guess 14 states are ripe for stolen elections.

      • The2b@lemmy.vg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is just conspiricism with no basis. There has never been any evidence of any noteworthy amount of voter fraud in US history. Even the Heritage Foundation has marked only ~1000 votes as POTENTIALLY fraudulent out of billions (less than 0.0001%)

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Specifically individual voter fraud, which voter ID claims to be fighting. Now, voter fraud in the masses via ballot manipulation, voter disenfranchising, gerrymandering, minimizing poll locations and times, etc. THAT is a thing, but has nothing to do with people having IDs, and all to do with people in power making sure they stay there.

          And guess which ones support both voter ID and all of those tactics. Yeah, we all know. It’s the only way they stay in power. They can’t win by just their positions on policy. Never could. If they could win fairly, they never would have pursued gaming the system.

          • The2b@lemmy.vg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The forms of fraud you are listing are election fraud, which IS obviously very common (and according to the Supreme Court, very legal now)

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            and all the fraud has been in GOP controlled states. most of the stuff they claimed, like ballot stuffing, or dead people voting came from republican strongholds.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guarantee that election issues will pop up regardless of ID laws in a state. Because that isn’t the problem, and never was. It is just another way to target certain demographics that tend to vote a certain way. A form of disenfranchisement.

        Source - it happens constantly, in every recent election. If you haven’t heard about all the efforts to stop some people from voting, then you must not live in a state where it’s a regular thing.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          its voter suppression: gerrymandering only works to an extent thats why use voter id, removal of polling places, drop boxs, times when polling places are open on certain days,etc.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        no those only require your license or SSN, not proof of citizenships ;which is a updated passport, naturalization papers, birth certificate which are quite difficult to acquire. even getting a real ID is very annoying. additionally the clerks might not believe its valid for one reason or another too.

        a naturalization paper can cost several hundred apparently you have to make an appointment with the agency responsible for it. birth certificate is slightly easier, pay more online service or go in person.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    wanna bet most of them have a significant african american population the ones that require ID. i read they also use prisoners as part of thier census too, so there is incentive for red state to incarcerate people left and right.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    YSK it’s not fun when someone else votes for you because of a stolen identity. YSK your identity has likely been stolen on average 3 times this year and companies have absolutely no reason to protect your identity.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      YSK it’s not fun when someone else votes for you because of a stolen identity.

      I’m sure the thing that doesn’t happen would be pretty awful if it did.

      Now imagine not being able to vote because your wallet was stolen or because you don’t drive a car and don’t need an ID except for one day every two years to vote. Or being home bound or extremely poor and not having easy access to renew your ID. Or any of the other things that make it difficult to present an ID that you have to pay for but you don’t need for anything other than voting.

  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Everyone on .world in *these comments* is lovin’ this lmao fuck the poor, the destitute, and anyone else The New Colossus claimed to desire. This will be used to continue to disenfranchise voters as it already has. If we continue down this path as we have violence is inevitable as it is already being perpetrated. Enjoy, fascists agreeing with this.

    Edit *