fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agoThere was an attempt at scale.mander.xyzimagemessage-square81fedilinkarrow-up1682arrow-down19
arrow-up1673arrow-down1imageThere was an attempt at scale.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square81fedilink
minus-squareTrickDacy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·4 days agoI think it gets the point across even if it’s off by orders of magnitude.
minus-squarepotoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·4 days agoI get that, but I personally think 60,000,000 tiny buffalo would be more impactful. Can someone do a quick edit in Photoshop?
minus-squareBalex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·4 days agoThere’s not even 60,000,000 pixels in that image.
minus-squarecrimson_iris@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days agoWell not with that attitude.
minus-squarecrimsonpoodle@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoWe just need dithering with different levels of grey representing a different amount of Bison, arranged so that the macro pattern still registers as a Bison; but in fact it would be a mega Bison.
I think it gets the point across even if it’s off by orders of magnitude.
I get that, but I personally think 60,000,000 tiny buffalo would be more impactful. Can someone do a quick edit in Photoshop?
There’s not even 60,000,000 pixels in that image.
Well not with that attitude.
We just need dithering with different levels of grey representing a different amount of Bison, arranged so that the macro pattern still registers as a Bison; but in fact it would be a mega Bison.