Uber launched a feature Monday to allow both women riders and drivers across the U.S. to be matched with other women for trips, expanding a pilot program aimed at addressing concerns about the safety of its ride-hailing platform.

The new feature is being rolled out nationwide despite an ongoing class action lawsuit against the policy in California, filed by Uber drivers who argue that it discriminates against men. Rival ride-hailing company Lyft is facing a discrimination lawsuit over a similar offering that it introduced nationwide in 2024.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    While understandable, being able to request specific characteristics from your driver, like sex and gender, is putting drivers at risk even more than they already were. Like I can already think of a few dark scenarios and situations that are facilitated by this feature. In fact, this feature opens Uber drivers up as a much more viable source of victims for sex offences, robbery, stalking/inceldom, etc.

    • Velma@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d be curious to see if Lyft found that attacks on drivers increased when they started offering this. I wouldn’t think there would be that great of a difference honestly. Women drivers are already at increased risk in general.

    • MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      No, women being able to request female drivers doesn’t put them more at risk. It’s puts them much less at risk. Why are you making things up? You fantasizing about “dark scenarios” doesn’t make them likely.

      If you have any friends…chances are you have one or more that have been sexually assaulted after hiring a ride…that’s how common it is.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        you didn’t understand their point.

        being able to choose that a woman will show up increases the availability of somebody getting a woman to show up where they want. this is a non-zero increase in risk for that specific event.

        • MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          So your logic is that because it’s theoretically possible for the system to be “gamed”…the option shouldn’t be available for anyone? SMH

          Uber aren’t saints…they’re just reacting to behaviour that’s already happening: A customer can already “vet” their driver and choose somebody with lots of ratings and their preferred (declared) gender etc. This option isn’t creating any additional harm…all it’s doing is adding a filter…and therefore a niche for women who want to provide rides to females and vice versa.

          A criminal lying about who they are won’t be exasperated or eliminated with this new option. There’s no downside.

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’m not reading your comment since you referred to it as “my” logic, btw

            get some reading comprehension