A federal judge found that the Internal Revenue Service broke the law "approximately 42,695" times by giving confidential information to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
In the context of the article, this sounds merely like evidence for the appeals case aiming to overturn the order to block information sharing between the two agencies. So…at best they don’t get to continue breaking the law? Which seems appropriate - we can’t just shoot everyone in the back who breaks a privacy law 42,695 separate times. It’s not like they’re teenagers stealing snacks from Walmart.
The ongoing case over IRS and DHS data sharing is now set to be heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. DHS is actively appealing Kollar-Kotelly’s November order blocking the IRS from sharing data with DHS, which was signed last year by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The then-acting commissioner of the IRS resigned after the deal was signed.
Are lashes still an option? The ’ to big to fail’ or ‘it’s an organization, we can’t punish everyone’ might be the source of so many of America’s problems.
In the context of the article, this sounds merely like evidence for the appeals case aiming to overturn the order to block information sharing between the two agencies. So…at best they don’t get to continue breaking the law? Which seems appropriate - we can’t just shoot everyone in the back who breaks a privacy law 42,695 separate times. It’s not like they’re teenagers stealing snacks from Walmart.
Are lashes still an option? The ’ to big to fail’ or ‘it’s an organization, we can’t punish everyone’ might be the source of so many of America’s problems.
Lashes? You want them to look fabulous?
((((((((( ))))))))