UltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoNot that limitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1548arrow-down127
arrow-up1521arrow-down1imageNot that limitlemmy.worldUltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squaremercano@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27arrow-down2·2 days agoThat’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·1 day agoThere’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
minus-squareAlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down3·edit-21 day agoChatGPT is such garbage. edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
minus-squareSeptugenarianSenate@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·19 hours agoclaude is gaud
minus-squarebunchberry@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
minus-squarePeppycito@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoRote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.
That’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
There’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
ChatGPT is such garbage.
edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
claude is gaud
ChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
Rote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.