On Wednesday, a new study published in JAMA by researchers at the University of Washington in Seattle projected that by 2035, nearly half of all American adults, about 126 million individuals, will be living with obesity.

The study draws on data from more than 11 million participants via the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Health and Nutrition Examination and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and from the independent Gallup Daily Survey.

The projections show a striking increase in the prevalence of obesity over the past few decades in the U.S. In 1990, only 19.3% of U.S. adults were obese, according to the study. That figure more than doubled to 42.5% by 2022, and is forecast to reach 46.9% by 2035.

  • bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I used to be 330; I’m 5’8". I got down to 220 through diet and exercise. That’s still obese. I did 10k on the Nordictrack this morning, can run a 7 minute mile, and routinely do full-body weight lifting including 10x140 chest presses and 10x300 leg presses. I’m now up to 260, which is even worse obese.

    I don’t know how to get to a healthy BMI and I know I’m routinely failing to get there, but I’m trying.

    • robocall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What are your thoughts on weight loss drugs like Wegovy and Mounjaro? Would you consider using them?

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I did. I didn’t start lifting until I had my cardio doing much better. IIRC, I started lifting after I is a sub-30min 5km for 28 days in a row. But, I might have did some lifting before then.

        Cardio is more my priority because the NIH recommendations are primarily about cardio, with weight/resistance training being secondary. I need to get my running / treadmill 10km to under an hour – the Nordictracktm lets me do a sub-hour 10km, but I’m not sure it’s getting my HR up quite as much as treadmill time. I find it easier to keep myself in “zone 2” on a treadmill with HR sensors in some hand grip.

    • homura1650@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Talk to your doctor. BMI is a crude metric that doesn’t distinguish between fat and muscle. For understanding population level statistics, this is good enough. But for individuals it can be highly misleading; particularly those that do strength training.

      If you wanted to lower your BMI, there is a good chance that stopping all weight lifting would do that for you. But that would probably make you less healthy, despite “improving” your BMI.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Cholesterol was high last time, but normal the time before that. Magnesium was normal this time, but high the time before. Dr. seems to think things are fine (or at least hasn’t called me out on anything), with the exception of my BP, which is fine with my current prescription, but will baseline to 150+ if I go off it. BP isn’t sodium sensitive; still goes to 150+ on a very low (near minimum) sodium diet.

        Definitely a lot better than when I was 330 and didn’t have my prescription.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      why are you talking about weight when you should be measuring body fat?

      Weight lifters weigh more because muscle is heavy.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah, I should get an 8-contact machine for home to get good BF% numbers.

        That said, it’s not hard to find the excess fat on my body, so while I don’t have good measurements, I know my BF% is also still too high. I have promised myself that if I can get a visible “6-pack”, I’ll stop worrying about weight so much, but I doubt that will happen soon.

        Weight and BMI are easier for most people (including myself) to habitually track, especially individually. But I agree that BF% is the better metric.

    • dil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If you want to be toned, don’t do max weight low reps, do high reps lower weight and stop trying to get stronger. I lost weight but was just getting physically bigger and not looking more muscular, only my belly and double chin went away but I stayed basically the same size. I felt a lot healthier tho, just generally good and had no issues being active at edm festivals, I quit working out and I looked skinnier after a while, but feel weaker now that it’s been two years.

      I preferred being bigger and feeling strong over now where I can fit large instead of xl but can’t be active for as long without pain. I personally only enjoy the gym when I’m going for a new max weight for every set every week. Ik logically that gaining muscle and lifting heavier should lead to more calories burned naturally and should lead to losing weight and looking less big, but id just gain muscle under my fat layer and look bigger.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’m not trying to get bigger. I’m following the NIH guidelines to do 1 set of 10 reps and move weight up if/when you can do 2 sets.

        I was at 10x280 on the leg press for over a year, but I noticed it getting “too easy” a few weeks ago. Bicep curls still kill my left arm, and I can only do about 60 on those.

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          dude curling 60 is huge. most people can’t do 30. you’re not gonna be a small guy when you’re curling 60

          • dil@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            He probbaly means 60 on a bar? So like 35-40 which is normal, most dudes curl that if they goto the gym a lot and wont have arms that look big unless they flex.

          • bss03@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I think most people give their single-arm / free-weight curl weight. I can only do about 25 on my left arm with that. (My right arm does more and doesn’t hurt in the same way.)

            The curl machine I use has both hands on the same bar, and that’s how I can do 60. I don’t mean to be confusing, but I often have trouble talking about lifting because I’m entirely self-taught and didn’t start paying attention to what I was doing until I was like 40. (I avoided exercise for most of my life.)

            That said, I’m doing more weight than many people in the gym, so I’m not small. On the hip extension and the rotary abdominal / oblique machines, I do the whole stack 170 lbs. and then +20 lbs.

            No shade to people no matter what they can lift. Honestly, I’m more proud of what my 93-year-old grandma does, and it is understandably much less. Health the goal, not weight. You just move the weight up to make sure you are continuing to exert.

    • PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Unfortunately what works for one person might not work for the next. I tried to lose and keep weight off for years without much success, but for me finally getting on thyroid medicine helped get it off for good. Turns out I was snacking because I was so fatigued all the time. It’s a frustrating process to try and find what works for you, especially when everyone just says it’s all calories in vs calories out.