• stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Why do people assume gold has intrinsic value? I just saw today they were freaking out about how much gold is fluctuating, it is just as imaginary as the dollar.

    Technically the Big Mac does provide some form of intrinsic value in the form of food for the homless. but for the average person it would actually give them more value to take the big mac away so it has sorta a negative value, negative intrinsic value, I think I just invented that.

    • ooterness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The word “fluctuating” implies the price of gold has been going up and down. That is not what has happened since the Commander-In-Thief took office.

      Market price of one ounce of gold over the last five years:

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Gold is nothing but an uncertainty indicator proxy, if gold price goes up, people are unsure in the market and future returns and thus buy gold, if the price is low the market and economy feels stable and people don’t buy gold

    • Stitch0815@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This comment actually made me think and look it up. I never thought about this. Why is gold valuable?

      Yeah you were basically right. Because societies decided it would be. I mean gold has some practical applications but nothing that would justify it’s price.

      First link I found says this:

      • Gold’s value is ultimately a social c- onstruction; its worth is sustained by ourcollective agreement about its importance and our belief in its future value.

      • Gold’s physical properties—its lustrous quality, relative scarcity, durability, and difficulty of extraction—reinforce and justify its perceived value.

      • Unlike other precious metals, gold strikes a balance of being rare enough to be precious but abundant enough to serve as a practical medium of exchange.

      So I guess rare enough yet abundand enough and durable enough.

      Wild tbh

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Even so, in a scenario where all the currencies fall apart, Gold and Silver are very probable to become the basis of wealth.
      Nowadays, stuff like SiIicon and Copper are pretty high value (and similarly, Germanium), but they really depend a lot upon hard to measure purity which goes with high-technology.
      So Gold and Silver, which are easier to determine with lower technology (unless someone uses high-technology to spoof them) and also easier to make into useful products, will tend to hold intrinsic value.

      Value of iron and others, break down due to abundance, while steel depends upon technology and expertise.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Also because gold and silver are what people will mentally default to. Even if you develop a quick, easy, and free test to determine the purity of cobalt or neodymium and demonstrate how they’re more functionally valuable, people will still default to trading au and ag to buy the amount of those metals they need. Copper would be next.

        So why gold? Because everyone knows that enough people will trade for it, in the same way you know your landlord, grocer, and bar will all take your country’s currency, and that’s why you accept it in exchange for your labor