toomanypancakes@piefed.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWhat's the worst game you've ever had the misfortune of playing? message-squaremessage-square171fedilinkarrow-up1113arrow-down13
arrow-up1110arrow-down1message-squareWhat's the worst game you've ever had the misfortune of playing? toomanypancakes@piefed.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square171fedilink
minus-squareℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 days agoSnakes and Ladders is the only game bad enough to avoid that I’ve nevertheless been obliged to play repeatedly.
minus-squareClent@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoCandy land is worse. There are deck orders that make the game unwinnable.
minus-squareJolteon@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·19 hours agoPretty sure you’re supposed to shuffle the deck before flipping it back over.
minus-squareClent@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 hours agoOf course, and the chance of two unwinnable decks in a row is astronomical small. But the fact that it’s possible puts the game at the top of my least favorite games list. Just above chutes and ladders.
Snakes and Ladders is the only game bad enough to avoid that I’ve nevertheless been obliged to play repeatedly.
Candy land is worse. There are deck orders that make the game unwinnable.
Pretty sure you’re supposed to shuffle the deck before flipping it back over.
Of course, and the chance of two unwinnable decks in a row is astronomical small. But the fact that it’s possible puts the game at the top of my least favorite games list. Just above chutes and ladders.