• apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Outside of the overt extortion for entry bit, how would this be any different than the current UN where the US unilaterally controls basically every decision or its consequences?

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      It’s called the board of peace so we can assume it will be a global Mafia demanding protection money, and going to war whenever it’s the more profitable outcome.

      The kind of group that should be nuked from orbit.

    • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s his same old song. Tear down what already exists, then huck a new version of it out for the very low price of $19.84.

      I’m surprised he hasn’t added his name to the title of it yet.

    • Vikthor@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      13 hours ago

      UN SC is not unilaterally controlled by the US, other permanent members get a veto too. That’s why he would like to replace that.