No, it is not.

Remember to donate to open source development, y’all!

I mean, all modern browsers are forks. I don’t understand your point.

Get ready for the Firefox defenders to comment as the water in the kettle they are swimming in gets a few degrees warmer.

You’re an icicle.

Ball was spun off and is a subsidiary of Rubbermaid.

👏

Yum yum in my tum tum.

Technocracy = fascism

This is the intended use.

That’s a decent place, I guess! I probably don’t see that in the right click menu because I have everything disabled.

I don’t know what you are defending here. ML = “machine learning”. The first one enables or disables machine learning: a broad strokes API that plugs generative models into Firefox. It is the first step. Yes: a sidebar is innocuous. I still use it myself. However, I have the machine learning chat sidebar disabled so that they cannot shove whatever generative prompts, etc in my face based on their contractual agreement with Google.

https://flamedfury.com/posts/disable-ai-in-firefox/

In twelve obfuscated steps! This is dark pattern design, not even simply poor usability design of opt-out.

Quit shoving this AI stuff down our throats, Mozilla. Even a simple opt out is missing.

But I say paynit bertter.

Jennifer Aniston is an asshole boss.

“You are part of the rebel alliance and a traitor,” same guy.

As a person who watches a fair bit of the sport, I absolutely agree.

Horrifying.

Much less horrifying is the presumably AI written text in the article that I nearly had an aneurism reading:

The 1986 Chornobyl explosion – which happened when Ukraine was under Moscow’s rule as part of the Soviet Union – sent radiation across Europe. In the scramble to contain the meltdown, the Soviets built over the reactor a concrete “sarcophagus” with only a 30-year lifespan. The new confinement was built to contain radiation during the decades-long final removal of the sarcophagus, ruined reactor building underneath it and the melted-down nuclear fuel itself.

How are the concepts of ‘think for yourself’ and ‘respect people’s rights’ an absolute dichotomy?