Some 1,500 active duty Army paratroopers have been put on alert for a potential deployment to Minnesota, according to two defense officials.

They’re ones who are trained and equipped for arctic warfare. This is kind of thing you do when planning to massacre civilians.

Edit: The Washington Post is now saying the same thing:

Pentagon readies 1,500 soldiers to possibly deploy to Minnesota, officials say

Soldiers with the Army’s 11th Airborne Division in Alaska have been placed at the ready following Trump’s Insurrection Act threat, according to defense officials.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      “She does have a weird laugh and you’re not supposed to laugh when you’re the potus, she looks crazy.” my dad. I tried explaining emotional intelligence and was repeated the same line.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      2 days ago

      She was a sold out corporatist running a status quo campaign. Not a popular one either, never breached 30 approval the entire term pre anointment. Disliked by both blacks and woman, not that that will stop you blaming bigotry, as if that would excuse throwing the election.

      • amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thank god you avoided that mess am I right?

        Look I have no horse in this other than the fact that whatever happens with your fucked up country seems to spill over the rest of the world. Was she perfect? Hell no. Was she liked ? Hell no. Was she crazy and surrounded by crazier people? Also no.

        So I am not sure what is it you are trying to say but what I am saying is, having her would have avoided us being on the brink of collapse into another world war.

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          51
          ·
          2 days ago

          They ran status quo against reform, with the most unpopular choice they could find.

          One of the few that had approvals even lower than the r candidate, never breaching 30%.

          I can’t make it any easier to understand than that.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            The state backed media portrayed it Biden Kamala as “status quo”. In the real world though, Trump clearly has no opposition to maintaining the status quo for billionaires no matter who he has to murder or regime change to do so.

            I would argue the Biden FTC chair represented more long term threat to major US corporations than anything Trump has done.

            • hector@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Yet we all know the voters don’t know the what the republicans are. That voters know they are being screwed if not by whom. The only ones promising to do anything about it were republicans.

              Amazing how such a simple point is missed by so many because you trust fancy people that tell you otherwise that have been wrong about everything. In the next breath complaining about the media owned by corporations after people working for those same people spoon feed you your opinions.

              • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                21 hours ago

                same people spoon feed you your opinions.

                Name one opinion I have or one person I get my opinions from

          • amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            40
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ok and as responsible voters it would have been absolutely disastrous to vote for her instead of letting this orange baboon get in with a vengeance. I understand! Thank you!

            • Aqarius@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              25
              ·
              2 days ago

              …Wait, why are you expecting responsibility from voters but not the heads of a full-on political party?

                • Aqarius@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  I mean, this is bait, but of course it’s both. And I do genuinely mean both, the game of chicken isn’t single player, but of the two, one side failed as citizens, and the other both as citizens and as professionals, who the first side literally pays to not let shit like this happen. That’s the problem.

              • amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                21
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I am not expecting anything. I am just saying you guys voted (or didn’t even bother) against your interest. He told you what he was going to do yet you chose that as the moment to send a lesson to the democratic leadership who clearly can’t give two shits about what the voters want. To think that the only ones responsible are those in the upper echelons of the Democratic party is quite childish.

                • Aqarius@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You assume much of your interlocutors.

                  But also, I don’t think you realize it, but you just endorsed not voting Democrat. If your stance is to be taken seriously, and the democratic leadership “clearly can’t give two shits about what the voters want”, then voting in your interest requires either swaying the Republican party, or starting a third party. And, considering the “moment to send a lesson” wasn’t 2024, but 2016, and the lesson not only clearly wasn’t learned, but seems to have gone entirely unnoticed and forgotten, I fear you may be right.

            • hector@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              26
              ·
              2 days ago

              So it’s everyone else’s fault except for the people forcing an unwinnable strategy, got it.

              • amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                24
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Well kind of. In this case and in your voting system you only have two choices. One is crazy and vile the other you dislike out of principle. One told you what he is going to do, the other you didn’t like the message, the framing the status quo and all that you said (which don’t get me wrong, if this was any other time you would be perfectly right!). And now we are here! At this point from the outside looking in, you voted against your best interest … There is no other way to look at it. But what you say stands because like I said, if this was the second bush campaign, hell even if this was again the first trump campaign you are absolutely right. But this last time you knew what was going to happen! He told you! Yet …

                • hector@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  20
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  That is not a very accurate analysis at all. The democrats are controlled opposition. They are playing good cop to republican bad, even as republicans are openly playing hitler.

                  Your analysis just boils down to victim blaming. If only we perpetually voted for the less bad option we would be enjoying more plutocratic rot and a slower degeneration.

                  But if that was your goal, you had to be popular enough to win. So you only have yourselves to blame if you trusted the democratic establishment to know what they were doing. After 3 successive shit shows of presidential elections at that.

                  • village604@adultswim.fan
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    16
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    If an outlet in your home started an electrical fire, it would be pretty stupid to ignore the fire to focus on fixing the wiring. You don’t have any more wiring if the house burns down.

                    Their analysis was totally accurate. The voters who abstained from voting D as a protest decided that the wiring had to be fixed first instead of putting out the fire and focusing on the wires once the immediate danger was taken care of.

                    The only victims here are those who did what they had to in order to prevent Trump’s second term. Everyone else made a choice to risk it and lost.

                  • amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Ok sure but now you have this. What do you say about this situation. I am really curious if you will ever vote again or if your vote will matter anymore down the line.