cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/48071860

Archived

A new report by Genocide Watch, a rights group, concludes that the Chinese Communist Party’s policies against Uyghur Muslims meet multiple advanced stages of genocide under international law.

The report finds that the Chinese government’s actions in Chinese-occupied East Turkistan aka the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region span Stages 3, 8, 9, and 10 of genocide. These include systematic discrimination, mass persecution through detention and torture, exterminatory acts such as mass rape and the removal of Uyghur children, and ongoing denial by Chinese authorities and their international defenders.

Genocide Watch documents the use of mass detention camps, forced political indoctrination, bans on the Uyghur language, widespread destruction of mosques, forced labor programs, coercive population control policies, and the separation of Uyghur children from their families into Mandarin-only institutions. The report warns that these acts constitute both genocide and crimes against humanity under the Genocide Convention.

“This report removes any remaining ambiguity,” said Arslan Hidayat, Team Lead of the Save Uyghur Campaign. “Genocide Watch is clear that what is happening to Uyghurs is not cultural policy or counterterrorism. It is a coordinated campaign that has reached the extermination and denial stages of genocide. Governments that continue business as usual with Beijing are choosing complicity over accountability.”

[…]

“These recommendations are not radical. They are the minimum legal and moral obligations of states that claim to uphold human rights,” said Imam Abdul Malik Mujahid, President of Justice For All. “The stages of genocide identified in this report are a warning to the world. History will judge whether governments acted when the evidence was undeniable or looked away while an entire people were erased.”

[…]

  • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Lmao, OP, I am once again asking you to drop evidence of a Uyghur grnocide that does not immediately recycle Radio Free Asia or Adrien Zenz talking points.

    If you actually read this “new” report, youll find there is very little new content - aside from whatever new pieces RFA has put out this year.

    At this point, you can look at the sources for this “new” article and notice it leans HEAVILY on another report from Rian Thum

    Eight Years On, China’s Repression of the Uyghurs Remains Dire: How China’s Policies in the Uyghur Region Have and Have Not Changed,”

    And what happens if we look at this reports references?

    Just more circular references to Zenz.

    (This one is especially funny, because in the intro, they talk all high and mighty about how their ONLY sources are primary Chinese documents from the state, or leaks from the state. And in the footnote, they basically say “yeah we cant read this, so see what our buddy Zenz had to say about it” despite the fact that that Zenz doesnt speak Chinese. The same Zenz who says Hitler had good ideas on population control, by the way)

    This OP is draped in congressional language, and its got the length to boot… But this is not a new report. This is not even an investigation. This is essentially the US government dropping a summary of all of their new RFA pieces that have dropped this year. I encourage anyone lookin at these reports to be critical of RFA and Zenz. Having an ounce of skepticism will immediately reveal that the vast majority of the times, these China hit pieces on Uyghurs are just circular references of Zenz and RFA.

    • Rimu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I don’t know where you’re getting those screenshots from? Here is the ‘report’ - https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/genocide-emergency-xinjiang-china-2025. It has completely different content than your screenshots and is just a single page, not hundreds like what you have.

      Is https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/genocide-emergency-xinjiang-china-2025 just a press release and not the full report? It seems super short and mostly just a collation of links.

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago
      Images need link to source.

      Images of text break much that text alternatives do not. Losses due to image of text lacking alternative such as link:

      • usability
        • we can’t quote the text without pointless bullshit like retyping it or OCR
        • text search is unavailable
        • the system can’t
          • reflow text to varied screen sizes
          • vary presentation (size, contrast)
          • vary modality (audio, braille)
      • accessibility
        • lacks semantic structure (tags for titles, heading levels, sections, paragraphs, lists, emphasis, code, links, accessibility features, etc)
        • some users can’t read the image due to lack of alt text
        • users can’t adapt the text for dyslexia or vision impairments
        • systems can’t read the text to them or send it to braille devices
      • web connectivity
        • we have to do failure-prone bullshit to find the original source
        • we can’t explore wider context of the original message
      • authenticity: we don’t know the image hasn’t been tampered
      • searchability: the “text” isn’t indexable by search engine in a meaningful way
      • fault tolerance: no text fallback if
        • image breaks
        • image host is geoblocked due to insane regulations.

      Contrary to age & humble appearance, text is an advanced technology that provides all these capabilities absent from images.