• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I’m through 2/3 of the article and I can’t seem to figure out what exactly they’re doing wrong besides working while kurdish and selling “illegal vapes”. Am I missing something, or is this just as blatant an attempt to stir up tensions over migrants as it seems?

    • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Not just migrants - asylum seekers. How dare they escape certain death, make a perilously long journey and expect to earn enough money to live.

      • mjr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Blair’s government removed their permission to work while waiting for decision. That seems to have created an immoral incentive for decisions to be made very slowly at some later point, because if the government doesn’t decide, the ignorant can’t complain as much about refugees taking jobs.

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I think there’s a few reasons behind the slow-tracking of processing asylum claims.

          One is that they were just cutting anything they could in the name of Austerity. Just another way to funnel money from the poor to the rich.

          But the other is I think the same reason why the right-leaning press have had small boats on their front pages for years at this point, despite the reason for small boat crossings being a lack of safe legal routes and accounting for a small percentage of immigration - to make people hate immigrants.

          Why? Because the right mostly do well amongst the older generations. However, the Boomers are dying off, and younger people aren’t moving to the right the way they used to because they don’t have the assets to make that a sound financial choice.

          So the choice for the right becomes between changing your policies to appeal to more people, or creating wedge issues which you can make your entire election platform. And they’re not going to go to the effort of working out policies which would help people, are they? So create a “crisis” involving “those people” and be the party who’s against “those people”, and you should do all right.

          Unless an even more racist party comes along, of course…

      • tornavish@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’m sure the people who were There before the refugee are the ones complaining that the refugee took their job opportunity.

        I would guess that the job was available because no one wanted to take it except for a refugee