• CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Universities are supposed to be a place where assumptions are challenged and discussions occur. It’s difficult to have a reasonable conversation with the current political rhetoric, but it is still distressing that this is the state at present.

    There’s a theory too about how the right wing tends to pull a more emotional reaction which may make their rhetoric more convincing, which means freedom of speech isn’t exactly evenly distributed. But that’s a lot more than what belongs in a Lenny post.

    • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Charlie Kirk spouting transphobic propaganda is not a challenging discussion. It’s just Nazi vitriol. In an academic setting 💩 like that should be analyzed and disseminated via scholarly research, not amplified.

      • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I fully agree. I suppose that’s where I have a problem with hosting these twerps. They don’t need to be provided with a platform, and shouldn’t be permitted to buy access to the university. But what is the line, and who defends it? For example, discussing Gaza in a university forum could be a problem as well, depending on the jurisdiction. I