Deceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agoobserves your slitquokk.auimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1478arrow-down117
arrow-up1461arrow-down1imageobserves your slitquokk.auDeceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squarelogicbomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·23 hours agoI don’t get it. Don’t both top and bottom show interference patterns, or is this about something else?
minus-squaresbird@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·22 hours agotop is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
minus-squarelogicbomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·22 hours agoOh I see I was overthinking it.
minus-squareBjörn Tantau@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·19 hours agoThough as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·17 hours agoDo you mean that they are not as noisy?
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoHuh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.
I don’t get it. Don’t both top and bottom show interference patterns, or is this about something else?
top is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
Oh I see I was overthinking it.
Though as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
Do you mean that they are not as noisy?
More noisy.
Huh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.