Deceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agoobserves your slitquokk.auimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1504arrow-down117
arrow-up1487arrow-down1imageobserves your slitquokk.auDeceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squaresbird@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 day agotop is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
minus-squarelogicbomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 day agoOh I see I was overthinking it.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours agoDon’t worry. You’re were both right and wrong until we observed it.
minus-squareBjörn Tantau@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·22 hours agoThough as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·20 hours agoDo you mean that they are not as noisy?
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoHuh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.
top is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
Oh I see I was overthinking it.
Don’t worry. You’re were both right and wrong until we observed it.
Though as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
Do you mean that they are not as noisy?
More noisy.
Huh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.