The spending on space exploration isn’t what is stopping us on satisfying the basic needs of everyone. It’s political will that stops us there. It’s the fact that our governments do not see their populations as their priority. They see their corporations as their priority.
To which the answer is “Human”.
Woohoo. Side-moon!
Can somebody explain peertube for me? It sounds like it should be a federated video service, but either the federation doesn’t work very well or there’s nothing on it.
3yo cars are pretty much always less than half. ICE or EV
They can buy one of those packs to name a star after yourself. I’m sure they’d prefer that over a dirty crater.
Nowhere in the Bible is being gay defined as a sin.
I think that’s true of the new testament, but I think the old would hold male on male gay sex as a sin (i.e. “soddemy”). The act, not the state of being. I don’t think lesbianism is ever referred to.
But you’re right. The entire point is that we all sin and we all ask for forgiveness. We should all be humble to god.
Of course, it’s all bullshit, but it’s also been corrupted so much that Christians don’t even live by the lessons.
…signed an atheist that was forced into Bible study as a child.
This was intended before the mission. After conducting observations they were going to propose naming two craters. One for his wife, and the other for the space craft “Integrity”. The final approval is going to have to be from the International Astronomical Union (IAU) as they control the naming of all celestial bodies and geographic features on them.
Enable them to speak for themselves. Be the person that notices they are missing from the conversation and invites them in.
Yeah. Have you not seen Superman II?
Oh my god! They forgot Kenny.
Do people not generally know this?
He has incontinence missiles.
It resulted in voters receiving a ballot paper asking them to rank over a dozen candidates and the response to this by voters was quite negative because they felt that the process of intelligently researching and comparing that many candidates was unnecessarily laborious and people found the electoral system confusing.
I doubt that was really the public speaking. It’ll be politically active people who fear the change. People just need it explained to them a couple of times.
Ranking 12 people is well within most people’s grasp when parties are also involved. Most know their preference of paries, so that gives you gross blocking and then if you have particular knowledge of individuals you can apply it. The main thing is to make it clear they are voting for N winners.
You need to have randomised ballot order though. If somebody is just voting along party lines they will write 1-2-3 down the page for that party. If everyone does this it skews things.
That’s a separate question.
STV with a single winner is like holding multiple elections where the biggest loser gets eliminated each round. You can vote for your favourite uncle first, because you’d really like him to win, but because you’ve put other people at 2, 3 and 4 you still get a say who wins even though your uncle only got 7 votes. Your Single Vote gets Transferred to your next preference when he’s eliminated.
STV with multiple winners is the same but you stop eliminating people when you’re down to however many you need.
STV with multi-member constituencies.
I think it gets discarded because “it’s still not PR” but I think the advantages outweigh this.
It’s the beginning of reality biting for sure.
I think the big one will be when companies like openAI and anthropic have to file audited books in order to IPO (which they both want to do).
Amazing how the countries side over it?
Are you suggesting we should boil them first?
They are a terrifying vector for disinformation - one that only the rich and powerful can create. People generally don’t understand that LLMs 1) will lie to them, and 2) can be tuned to spread any message the owner of the model wants.