Ⓐ☮☭

  • 4 Posts
  • 841 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2023

help-circle
  • I would call that an observer of some kind.

    I actually have some ideas as I spend a rather unhealthy amount of freetime thinking of quantum mechanics. While not at all being a proper scientist but i have come to perceive the concept of a blended multiverse.

    When you are in a room alone, there are tons of things you could be doing. You become slightly dis-entangled from the world. You only experience one slice, the thing you know you are doing, but actually exists in superposition from the perspective of the rest of the world. At the same time the rest of the world exists in a state of superposition towards you. When you break your isolation and interact with the world in any way your experienced slice of reality becomes entangled to a slice of reality that is the rest of the world.

    But the entanglement is a spectrum. Even alone in a room you still know that you are on earth and that gravity exists. You are entangled to you awareness so whatever infinite amount of things you could do, flying is not one of them. Except in a slice reality where its normal for gravity to not exists. But you, nor the rest of the world can interact with that specific slice. Our consciousness has evolved to perceive reality as if it makes sense with our primitive capacity, we can not perceive reality outside of what we all entangled consciousness networks within a context system understand as shared coherent reality.

    When a friend group splits up each member could lead many different lives, all of those exist in superposition . But when you get back together to talk about old times in that moment of that conversation most of those different version of their lives are unified and entangled into one slice again. Then when they start talking about the rest of their lives you entangle to that one slice of their multiverse lives.

    Anyway this is oversimplified of my actual ideas and again i am not an accomplished scientist. I do not take myself too serious about these things but i love conceptualising all of It.




  • All of these could be signs of adhd, but none of these are definitive without more details.

    If you want to be sure you need to talk to a professional.

    If you want to compare with diagnosed neurodivergents for reference. About the trouble focusing:

    Every single school report i took home, from first grade to the end of highschool with no exceptions had a variation of a single added comment. “never pays attention in class”



  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyztomemes@lemmy.worldThe audacity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I have done it. Use controller when in a vehicle and mouse + keyboard outside of it.

    But what kind of computer does not have a keyboard connected to it? And wireless mouse/controllers are not much more expensive then wired ones.

    Usb hubs aint expensive either. Actually both my keyboard and my monitor come with extra usb hubs build in.






  • The autistic community has been dying for this kind of accessibility accommodation for years.

    I cannot express how deeply this angers me. Though i am happy to exploit the fuck out of this for personal use.

    “Markdown offers a cleaner, more semantically clear representation of the content. This means less noise for language models and other text-analysis systems people that process information neurodivergently, resulting in more efficient processing and potentially lower compute costs real life physical exhaustion.“




  • King Richard I was once captured for ransom while traveling undercover trough Austria.

    His cover was blown specifically because he tried ordering a roast chicken.

    There are a few variations of the details in this story though, a peasant could definitely have owned a chicken and eaten it when it died but it was probably way more valuable to sell it.






  • Story time, third grader me would have done this no questions about it.

    Having to solve multiplication and recently had learned the table of 9 trick i was looking if there where other tricks I could find.

    The first one was number x10 and what i observed is that if you do times ten. You take the number. And you put 1 “0” behind it.

    Interesting…. I thought

    But the next one multiplied with a single digit so how could i apply that theory.

    Simple. 1+0 is 1, which is a single digit so if you multiply by 10, you actually multiply by 1+0 which means you put 1 zeros behind it

    Multiple by 2 is short for multiply By 2+0, put 2 zeros behind it

    Multiply by 9, put 9 zeros behind it.

    I definitely knew this is not what we had learned, and knew there was a “chance” i was going to fail all of these, i also even knew some of the actual answers however i also believed there was a chance that i found an alternative equally good solution, and I consciously decided to take that risk because I wanted to know if i was right. Maybe I discovered something new

    My teacher was not happy to say the least, and in that (actual) furry did treat me unfair and it still bothers me. Because i got a zero for the assignment… while i was very certain that the 2 occurrences of x10 did have the appropriate solution.