This being ai slop is also mildly infuriating.

Not sure what the context is to warrant this reaction. I am not part of the anti-everything-ai mob.

I fully agree on both points. Llms are here to stay and people need to learn to use them.

That said: “please check the output before you hand it out” seems like such a basic minimum.

i am actually shocked that usually smart people, including school teachers. Don’t practice this minimum of quality control.

But this wasn’t a teacher, this was “the administration” a plural of people of which any could and should have done this minimum.

At that point just hand out empty notebook instead. Its would actually be useable. It would be way less damaging to the image of the school. A School that cant write legible text in officials documents isn’t worth sending my kids too.

That is definitely the issue. And this problem is only ramping up in almost all fields.

https://www.wdrb.com/news/venecky-instead-of-kentucky-jcps-middle-school-parents-suspect-school-agendas-are-ai-generated/article_c0d3bef9-bda3-454b-8606-9cf3c5a6178d.html

They wont see this, they are to busy getting flooded with sports updates from some random trans teenager.

There is this site i got advertisement for that shows news “on both sides” and it highlights how some news like the above only exists for one side.

I wasn’t in this picture till you mentioned this.

Were not meant to feel sorry for this person.

This is not an emotion triggering article. Its a n information warning.

The apps some use to send private messages can call the cops on you if an ai gets context wrong. Kinda a big deal.

Somewhat strangly. “Everything is a psyop” is also what they want you to think.

The last part of the url is still the same Video id from youtube. You can copy that in whichever you use.

The internet actually really needs an overhaul to how links are presented. So you can press a video link and opening in the compatible player you prefer.

Same issue exists on lemmy. A link will send you to the instance of the poster, we have special ! Links to bridge the gap but i can never remember how to use em.

Public invidious instances are more a proof of concept, its much more performant to run it yourself.

We have been the steampunk universe all along!

1. I rarely watch tv cause i can’t pay attention.
2. When watching anything its usually short form content, i keep going back and forward sometimes on (twice speed) and may watch a video over multiple sessions, repeat sections multiple times.
3. i may pause in the middle of watching, a 30 min show, spend and hour researching a tiny detail on my phone and then go back.
4. i cannot pay attention to watch while eating unless its at a desk.
5. i can watch a +1h movie that is interesting enough with others in a single sitting but i will be mentally exhausted and in need of a break after.

Is that really that different?

The article doesn’t go into any length to explain the technology. But assuringly its just an encrypted passcode created with an algorithm using measured face data.

Crafting a secure reliable personal id based on pure visual appearance has been tricky and when this came out i disliked it but it was clearly a feat.

What is the story here?

Google trusting this technology?

Them adding age verification to it?

I am just confused what makes this enough of something to write/post it.

Did i just time travel or is this the feature i have been refusing to use on my phone for almost a decade?

Yeah November 2017; 8 years ago

Is this implemented very different technologically speaking?

The question i have,

The image is digital when it is uploaded. There is a fixed assortiment of pixels only differentiated by the contrast of shades of grey.

The instructions say to colorise.

In my head this means every pixel needs to obtain a color value, while still matching contrast with pixels around it.

What ai does instead is provide an entirely newly constructed image made up from entirely new pixels which show “google deepdream” patterns.

This is from the final result where the author was “happier” with the result and asked what i assume is an llm to not invent information that isn’t there. (Zoom in)

This is not what i would call a colorisation, it’s a colorised re-creation. I imagine a real colorisation as simply a layer of color values that combine with the exact pixels of the digital scan. Disabling that layer (using photo software) should return the exact digital original and turning the final colorisation into a black and white filter should still leave it nearly identical to the original. Anything else is a recreation for fun and fantasy purposes only.

To vent, i am so glad we convinced someone in the family not to use the “ai enhanced” version for a loved ones official funeral picture.

Actually!!

The litter of roombas is rather untidy but assuming they are themselves clean (taken out of the box just for this skit) then the room is not unclean because of their chaos.

I took it as a non serious joke riffing of a common meme.

Paid twice.

US citizens paid Nintendo for raising its prices on them… and the wild part is that it’s not even the corporations exact fault.

The system is designed to have capitalism win.

If i recall it was as an example of how “ai” can be more then just llm chatbots. I thought the com was specifically against llms but they didn’t like general machine learning either.

Long time ago though.

I one got banned from an anti ai com for mentioning video game npc ai.

The message isn’t but

“US Law Enforcement terrorise and kill innocent civilian(s)” sadly is.