Yes, if she doesn’t shut the fuck up and not talk to the cops.

It has worked after a violent struggle forced the system to change or gave opportunities for previously oppressed voices to come into power.

Reminds me a bit of Eyes Without a Face (1960).

Is it irony that they’re debating releasing an ethics report about a scumbag?

Just because it’s open doesn’t mean anyone can do it, but if it goes badly then a group of others could fork and rebuild.

What is it when someone believes they’re both shite? I guess that’s feminism, too?

True, but I think it’s pretty clear what they’re trying to actually do; to keep control of the account and use it.

But you own the goodwill and trademarks associated with what’s on the left of it.

Similarly, when people sell a business they sell the clients. It stands to reason that the followers can be like clients and should be transferred in the same way as in normal business sales.