And more EVs are being sold.

He has to win the election and this makes him look like shit.

In 2013 the $100 bill got a security feature upgrade. The $20 did not.

Angola and Equatorial Guinea???

This is Mohammed bin Salmans project. Those renders are a great distraction from MBS crack down against opposing royals and Wahhabi radicals inside the kingdom. It also keeps the national wealth fund busy.

It points to assets being inflated, due to the rich not being taxed properly any longer.

Every investment has grown incredibly in price. Stocks, gold and also housing. That is honestly the biggest reason a blue collar workers pay can no longer feed a family of five easily. In the 60s food was actually pretty expensive back then for example. In the US of 1960 a stick of butter would be the equivalent of $27.74 today. However housing was not and that makes up a huge part of current spending, if you do not own a property already.

Wait until they find out about “National Socialism”…

Thomas Müntzer fanboy.

Those were originally made in the 90s. Japans population peaked in 2008 and has declined by over 5million people since. All without war, disease or stuff like that.

This is also true for some other countries. The current medium UN forecast projects Chinas population to more then half by the end of the century.

Even that does not change things too much. Not to half anyway, but just to 14% of global CO2 emissions.

We also consume a lot of meat and the like, which means we can feed a lot more people, if we wanted too.

Today a good number of countries have natural population declines due to people having too few children. That includes some big ones like China, Russia, Japan, Germany and Italy. Also all continents beside Africa have a fertility rate below replacement. So in the coming decades the global population is likely to fall. Most of that is the side effect of good developments like women getting more rights, education and people becoming wealthier. It will just take time.

Forbes beat you too it.

By 2200, if you read the article. So basically have less children.

The article suggest halving the global population by 2200. So not some nuclear war or disease killing half of humans basically over night. So more Japan and less nuclear war.

The US is bad, but when you look at CO2 emissions it is still just at 12.7% of global emissions for example. Not even close to half. Obviously on a per capita bases that is still crazy high.

Two decades ago the US waged war to get oil from the Middle East. Today it wages war to stop oil from the Middle East.

Looks like the women on the left is wearing some sort of hijab. So certainly possible.

That was the time after WW2. Of cause the economy does a lot better, when you do not bomb out cities and kill millions. That could have happened earlier, without the war and everybody would have been better of.

The US is at war and China is not. The third most powerful country would be India and afaik they are not at war right now.