Kobolds with a keyboard.

  • 2 Posts
  • 808 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle

  • Not wanting to be a stay-at-home dad feels like such a boomer mentality. Like, seriously, what father is so disengaged from their kids that they wouldn’t want to spend more time with them, given the option? Being a stay-at-home parent is a lot of work, no one’s contesting that, but there’s no contesting that it’s more satisfying work than working for some megacorp’s bottom line.








  • and privatised

    Completely agree with you here. If the technology was being developed and made available to everyone for non-commercial use, while they charged for the commercial use cases, I’d have less of an issue with it (aside from the obvious and serious objection that they’re functionally stealing creatives’ work and profiting off of it - but again, I think this objection could be invalidated with UBI.)


  • I’m going to play devil’s advocate and present a hypothetical alternative here…

    Visual art is not about portraying something in such or such specific manner (be it realism, surrealism, or whatever else) it is about sharing an experience (which no AI can do, as it doesn’t live and can’t experience shit by itself) and it is about sharing an emotion that can be ranging from the pure emotional one to the most cerebral.

    AI art is boring.

    I’d argue that in some applications, this is fine. For example, corporate logos, the equivalent of clip art in presentations, etc. You can argue that that isn’t really ‘art’ in the sense that you’re describing it, but whatever you want to call it, personally, I don’t care if no artist has to do that BS. I highly doubt many artists really want to be doing that stuff. The problem isn’t that AI is being used to generate soulless art for soulless projects, it’s that it’s taking work away from real artists (and that we as modern humans, as a whole, put so much weight on employment).

    If we gave UBI to creatives that covered all of their expenses and let them pursue whatever projects they wanted to work on (and thereby we still, as a species, got to enjoy the actual art by actual artists), would it be so bad that the shitty work is being done by a computer? Theoretically there’d be more ‘real’ art, since artists wouldn’t have to waste their time on the bullshit. Let’s go back to a system of patronage, where society as a whole become the patrons.







  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.socialtoScience Memes@mander.xyzOh nuts!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 days ago

    I never had a problem with this. I think squirrels are as interesting to look at as birds are, perhaps moreso. I mean, look at the acrobatics this little guy has to perform just to get at that feeder. Unlike the birds who just fly down like it’s nothing. He’s putting in the effort, let him have the fuckin’ payoff.





  • Mate, if you know how to organize a hundred million people from an area as large as the US, I’m all ears. I sure don’t. I don’t know if anyone does. We have small groups doing what they can, but it’s not enough. I agree with you, we need collective action, but I’m at a loss for how to effect that.

    I also understand the general frustration, both from inside the US and out, but these thinly veiled suggestions that we should go attack ICE agents or start rioting or whatever else that keep getting thrown around on Lemmy and elsewhere are not helpful, either. Yes, we’re all frustrated, but taking brash, drastic action without the organization behind it will not solve anything.

    I don’t know if it’s more frustrating when it comes from folks inside the US or out. If someone is inside the US and calling for frankly suicidal acts, and yet are not performing those acts themself, they’re hypocrites, plain and simple. If someone is outside the US and calling for those acts… all I can say is, you aren’t helping at all, and if you aren’t willing to help organize or give us some ideas on how to organize, kindly keep those opinions to yourselves.