

Yeah, it usually means overstaffed with too expensive workers.


Yeah, it usually means overstaffed with too expensive workers.


They assume AI is only to get much better and will be able to replace higher expertise levels every year until everybody developer is replaced.


It’s the usual argument I guess.
EU: we’ll do our own defense
USA: about time! Lazy bums!
EU: with our own weapons and we’ll diversify trade for less risk
USA: how dare you! Our industry!


That means they’ll gerrymander that 40% to the top, block votes from as many as they can from the 60% and ICE the people that would decrease that 40% even a bit.


Roman empire fell apart over a few hundred years. USA is speed running this, so it’ll be a tad more stressful.
pedofiles
They’re called the Epstein class now


They tried in Russia and electronic payment terminals, that use a VPN, stopped working.


There are YouTube channels with letting the youth try to figure out old tech.


No, he’s just going to try to sabotage the voting in some way. Lots of institutions are already filled with henchmen and loyalists. The people don’t rise up too much and ICE can suppress the ones that do protest. And it’s just the dictator thing to do.


USA’s military industrial complex has focused on high profit complex machines, with rare earth elements that came from China. The complexity doesn’t help with the churning. And China isn’t exporting the elements anymore. Who knew that starting a trade war would have consequences. Setting up replacements is going to limit production for a long time.


“diminish the status” of marriage
Maybe, but the number of marriages is diminishing for sure.
Now watch the flat earth documentary.



That’s what people see


“We have specialists trained to ignore even the hardest of troubles!” ~ USA politician probably


USA fired a most of their weapons in Iran. There isn’t much left to come to Europe’s defense anymore even if Trump would help.
and the consequences of the Iran war still haven’t hit fully


That the same for taxes that UBI would depend on. See Panama papers. Corruption and loopholes are an issue in any system.


Yes, there is a need for tariffs, based on worst cause estimates of pollution, for countries not playing along.


Anything but doing UBI, lol.
Yeah, there seems to be a lot of resistance to giving money, replace systems and taxing parts of UBI.
Reworking existing systems seems easier.
You know how it goes. Fire people and assume AI is better next quarter. If it doesn’t work out, it’s also a problem for next quarter.