I am optimistic about self driving, just not Teslas. Unlike other self driving cars, Tesla is exlusively reliant on cameras. Others, like Waymo, have cameras, lidarr sensors and radar.

dicks out

You don’t need to be a journalist to copy/paste a title verbatim

4.5% of the population are psychopaths. 1.4% have a degree in maths.

coincidence?

The majority of the rest of the world has 220-230v per phase, with three phases. using all three phases gives you access to ~400v

neither are cartilages, yet they’re a part of the skeleton

???

Now I want to know what flibbar is

Hyperbolic-earthers approve.

hyperbolic-earthers you mean :D

Yup. I don’t think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should.

There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs “creating” “original” content.

One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.

On the other hand, it is not the learning in your example that is illegal, but the recital.

If you learn ten books by heart and make money writing shitty fanfics, thats not necessarily illegal.

and the music

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Just to confuse him, wait five minutes then eat just one of them.

sure, wirelessly.

it would, but the act of giving a dollar doesn’t double as a way to validate transactions

Not the article, the commenter before you points at a deeper issue.

It doesn’t matter how if your prompt tells it not to lie is it isn’t actually capable of following that instruction.

I assume they’re talking about the design and training, not the prompt.

or, like, a whole egg