Humans failed this guy.

I am not arguing this point, I agree.

A search engine presents the info that is available, it doesnt also help talk you into doing it.
A stranger doing it in a chatroom doing it should go to prison, as has happened in the past. Should this not also be illegal for LLM’s?

The fact the parents might be to blame doesn’t take away from how openai’s product told a kid how to off himself and helped him hide it in the process.

copying a comment from further down:

ChatGPT told him how to tie the noose and even gave a load bearing analysis of the noose setup. It offered to write the suicide note. Here’s a link to the lawsuit. [Raine Lawsuit Filing](https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Raine-v-OpenAI-Complaint-8-26-25.pdf)

Had a human said these things, it would have been illegal in most countries afaik.

Two things can be true. AI is here to stay, and we’re in a bubble. Look at the dot com crash, the bubble super popped, yet we still have the web.

Its not the AI tech thats gonna die, it’s its extreme overvaluation.

hah, self shadow ban

“or” ?

do you think they report that distinction to the advertisers?

ohh, tanks!

Am I missing a joke?

“don’t build the torment nexus”

now that was a disturbing mental jump if I ever saw one

Also intelligence isn’t some all encompassing thing. Just because you are a good learner or have superb spatial thinking or whatever else doesn’t mean you are good at planning for shit.

The classic view of intelligence completely misses how different people are, and how many different things intelligence could actually mean.

I agree, to me it reads “monday and/or friday”

if you start studying now, chances are the market will have improved when you graduate.

because me and many others hear “<coin you never heard about> would be perfect” and cant help but to immediately think scam

Don’t get me wrong, i like the idea, crypto just generally has a super bad track record

now do social credits!

we use language in different contexts. In the food store “fruit” has one meaning, while in a botany paper, it has another.

This doesn’t say theres no such thing as fish generally, it says there is no useful definition for it in a biological setting.

2000s: Actually, fish aren’t fish

https://www.sciencealert.com/actually-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-fish-say-cladists

I am very anger

then why the fuck is this newsworthy? ugh. Why is there such a huge hateboner for firefox lately?