Red meat has a huge carbon footprint because cattle requires a large amount of land and water.
https://sph.tulane.edu/climate-and-food-environmental-impact-beef-consumption
Demand for steaks and burgers is the primary driver of Deforestation:
https://e360.yale.edu/features/marcel-gomes-interview
If you don’t have a car and rarely eat red meat, you are doing GREAT 🙌🙌 🙌
Sure, you can drink tap water instead of plastic water. You can switch to Tea. You can travel by train. You can use Linux instead of Windows AI’s crap. Those are great ideas. But, don’t drive yourself crazy. If you are only an ordinary citizen, remember that perfect is the enemy of good.
To give you a consumption goal 🤷
I’m just curious if said consumption goal is based on any scientific rationale, and, if so, what that rationale is.
Eating less red meat, it’s better for the environment.
Look if you dont want to, that’s fine, but dont overcomplicate it. (You’re at a higher risk of a heart attack bc of all that red meat)