• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I like self checkout. I struggle with talking to people and it can really drain on me so it’s a godsend to have if I only need to run in for a few things.

    Valid take.

    That being said, I’d probably prefer human checkout unless we can get a more-automated form of self checkout. Self checkouts have gotten a lot better since the early days, but human checkers are still faster than I am at the self-checkout and if a human is doing the checkout, I can dick around on my phone or whatever.

    Cost savings are nice, but cost savings on my groceries just aren’t a massive concern for me. There just isn’t that much human time being expended on checking my back out. I don’t have strong feelings about the human interaction one way or another.

    Maybe one day, we can get some sort of robotic arm setup that can do checkouts as well as a human checker, and then I’d quite happily be in the “machine” camp.

    • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Oh I don’t give a crap about their “savings”.

      Even if self checkout is more expensive to the companies I still prefer self-checkout for personal reasons rather than economical ones.

      Besides the issues and opportunities for theft that self checkout creates means that it’s probably a wash as far as how much money they’re saving.

      I definitely understand though not wanting to like scan your own groceries or deal with the whole system it would refer somebody else to do it. That’s why they should have both available.