• oyzmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I think Honda has begun building spaceships/rockets too. Think they chose to build the type that don’t explode. link

    • Geodad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Japanese cars are superior to American cars, why wouldn’t their rockets be?

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Japanese cars are superior to American cars

        I had a high school friend who went on to become an engineer at General Motors. One of his first projects for them was tearing down an Infiniti and a Lexus when those cars first came on the market. He said that at the time, GM cars typically had between 300 and 400 production defects of varying severity. When they took apart the Infiniti, they found 2 production defects; when they took apart the Lexus, they found 0.

        • Geodad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I worked on the Lexus line in Georgetown, KY one summer between semesters. Their standards are insane. Worked the Toyota Camry line the summer before that.

          On the Camry line, if they found a defect, they would correct it, then have a QC stand there and inspect every affected car for the next month.

          I stood on the line with a screwdriver to check the tightness of a single screw on every sunroof in Camrys. It was so heavily coriographed, it was like a dance.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Definitely agreed on cars, but Japan’s last few moon missions had several catastrophic failures unfortunately.

        • Geodad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’ll have to read up on that. I didn’t know they had tried anything because of the whole can’t make missiles thing.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      51
      ·
      22 hours ago

      We shouldn’t be building rockets PERIOD. They cost too much and are eventually only going to serve trillionaires.

      FIX SHIT ON THE GROUND FIRST

      That said,

      They did a test from 300 meters, sure it’s cool but I think they have a LONG way to go before they are competetive.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        the thing is, when you build rockets, and they actually work, and put people on mars, you can reasonably demand that people who demand exponential growth actually go to mars, because earth is already full. this way, you can get rid of the billionaires.

      • Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        We can do both? What’s a rocket scientist going to do about systemic oppression and the rise of fascism that excludes them from working on rockets still?

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        If you like SatNav, accurate weather tracking, and advanced intercontinental communication then ya like rockets ya dipshit.

        While Id be the first to ban private rocket launches outright, we shouldn’t abandon the advances of the space age because of them.

        • gazter@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          14 hours ago

          You’ve got good points, but your needless insults makes your argument fall on deaf ears.

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Separating the message from the messenger is a key skill. A right answer doesn’t become wrong because it comes from a jerk.

            • gazter@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              You’re absolutely right, you absolute fuckwad, and well said, even if you are a shit eating waste of a human.

              (Sorry I don’t mean it, I feel bad now…)

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Yep me being an uncouth asshole has little to no bearing on my point. It’s like those uppity cunts who act like theyre better just cause they don’t swear, usually they are morons I mean Mormons and thusly my inbuilt snob filter works wonders.

              • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Hey there I didn’t complain or downvote but also declined to upvote cuz of the two little tiny words of ad hom……

                … (idea!) …

                DINGUS! Dingus would’ve saved it!

                ya dingus

                Perfect, feels very Lemmy-appropriate—gets the insult with a perfect lulz factor so even the parent commenter could’ve kinda laughed (I hope ppl can take jokes!)

                …sorry I know I’m not your mom, hope this doesn’t come across maximally prescriptive (just my 2c!)

              • gazter@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Agreed, but your point will usually be a lot better received if you aren’t a dick. SpaceX is a great example- it’s a great company, but the head of the company taints the whole thing they are trying to achieve.

                It comes down to respect. Even if I’m wrong, treating me with respect will mean I’m more likely to respect you, and if I respect you I’m going to respect your argument.