2·
3 days agoMergers: Commission fines Facebook €110 million for providing misleading information about WhatsApp takeover - Brussels, 18 May 2017
Classic
- 24 Posts
- 1.59K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: September 20th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
12·3 days agodeleted by creator
deleted by creator
Harder to organize protests though. Like if they implement a new renter’s/homeowner tax, or sales tax, or whatever, that means we’d have to sell our books to make ends meet. And then make “digitally inciting” protests illegal too maybe so you don’t feel comfortable even discussing it on your devices. (Not that our opsec today is sufficient, wager it’s not for like 95+% of us, but this feels yet worse)
Scary stuff
1·5 days agoThoughts on what I think is the standout from their comment?:
the advanced state of automaton
To be fair to Honda or, here, Toyota…
Worth finding a clip if anyone isn’t familiar
“RAG”’s tough in acronym form though concept is quite popular right now - decent summary btw I’d say (fully non-expert)
![screenshot of Hacker News with the following text per OCR: [flagged] Federal Surveillance Tech Becomes Mandatory in New Cars by 2027 (gadgetreview.com) 79 points by functionmouse 41 days ago | hide | past | favorite | 48 comments vetrom 41 days ago | next [-] There's a ton of bad reporting here, because the publications, or writers, are lazy about sourcing their reporting. In this case, there is a kernel of truth: The 2021-2022 "Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act" ( https://www.congress.gov/..) directs NHTSA to develop an in-vehicle driver system to detect some definition of impaired driving. In particular, "SEC. 24220" (searchable by that string in the above bill text.) directs NHTSA to either write and publish a rule implementing such, or make a yearly report to Congress as to why said technology is not implementable. This is the 2026 report: https://www.nhtsa.gov/site... In essence, they state that while they have prototypes, the technology is not yet sufficient. There's nothing in a proposed or final rule yet, to the best of my knowled](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/1427740f-4f86-4edc-96cd-2615d95a2367.jpeg)
firefox support is often not a priority even today
Dunno if I can name a time it was ;)
I guess it might be a priority for Mozilla sometimes
12·9 days agoIn this view, I’d like to ask whether it is also psycho to buy dead animals in plastic from the grocery store, bring them home and cook and eat them.
And if I may draw a parallel: “those benefactors could just donate money, why do they need a gala?“ It’s so much easier to part us from our money when we have some little reason or tangible thing (like donor gifts from public radio).
For this big group who is all us humans, “everyone could …” prob can’t compete with “IF you do, then reward”.
—
Heart: with you!
Logical brain: “wait but the utilitarian perspective…! Minimize total suffering regardless of personal emotional discomfort!” :) (practical implication perhaps that campaign to get those hunters to keep donating but stop killing would be counterproductive to animals?? IDK how it’d pencil out!)
2·10 days agoThanks, wondered about that vs. Tor!
Heard the Great Firewall is effective these days
2·14 days agoWrite product reviews using Amazon reviews, stuff with affiliate link, profit
Cognitive dark foresty
@a_g_marut@lemmy.world this already on Archive.org ? Good work preservationist!
Meta needs verifiable human eyeballs on ads or rates will head wayyyyy down
:’( poor general public