Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agoMake it stoplemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1552arrow-down117
arrow-up1535arrow-down1imageMake it stoplemmy.dbzer0.comDaftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 months agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squareDaftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-23 months agoYay, I can be bullied by the local idiots instead of idiots abroad.
minus-squareA_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·3 months agoNo, you can have a horizontal structure that doesn’t give anyone power over you and meets your needs.
minus-squareDaftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·3 months agoAnd who keeps the warlords at bay?
minus-squareA_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·edit-23 months agoIf literally everyone’s needs are met, why would anyone side with a warlord? Hmm I can participate in society with basically zero obligations other than “mind my own business”, or I can give up all my power to a strongman. Obviously communes are able to defend themselves, I don’t know why you seem to think they wouldn’t. Go read some theory and get back to me. Theanarchistlibrary.org is right there
minus-squareDaftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·3 months agoIm not looking for a fight, so no worries. I feel like its really easy to poke holes in anarchy but maybe we should just try to be good people so that the state is rendered useless.
minus-squareceenote@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·3 months ago If literally everyone’s needs are met, why would anyone side with a warlord? Because everyone’s needs being met =/= everyone’s desires being met.
minus-squareA_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·3 months agoWhy not? We’ve already established community self defense to deter would-be warlords. Your life, yes yours idgaf who you are, would be better under anarchism.
minus-squareDaftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-23 months agoAuthoritarians create crisis then claim power. It doesnt matter if everyone’s needs are being met. They will create chaos and then become the savior, being, “the only one who can fix it” ignoring the fact they created the problem in the first place.
Yay, I can be bullied by the local idiots instead of idiots abroad.
No, you can have a horizontal structure that doesn’t give anyone power over you and meets your needs.
Lol good luck with that
And who keeps the warlords at bay?
If literally everyone’s needs are met, why would anyone side with a warlord?
Hmm I can participate in society with basically zero obligations other than “mind my own business”, or I can give up all my power to a strongman.
Obviously communes are able to defend themselves, I don’t know why you seem to think they wouldn’t.
Go read some theory and get back to me. Theanarchistlibrary.org is right there
Im not looking for a fight, so no worries.
I feel like its really easy to poke holes in anarchy but maybe we should just try to be good people so that the state is rendered useless.
Because everyone’s needs being met =/= everyone’s desires being met.
Why not?
We’ve already established community self defense to deter would-be warlords. Your life, yes yours idgaf who you are, would be better under anarchism.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Authoritarians create crisis then claim power. It doesnt matter if everyone’s needs are being met. They will create chaos and then become the savior, being, “the only one who can fix it” ignoring the fact they created the problem in the first place.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator