• KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    The issue with smoking is the second hand smoke. It causes cancer, among many other health issues. Vape on the other hand doesn’t really have this same concern.

    They aren’t banning smoking because of nicotine, they are banning it because it causes cancer.

    • PattyP@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yes, secondhand smoke is bad. But we are talking about outdoor environments where it should usually be possible for smokers to keep their distance.

      As for vaping, it hasn’t really been around long enough yet to know for sure what the health risks are regarding the secondhand aerosol exposure, but there is reason to be concerned. It is almost certainly not as bad as secondhand smoke, but there are still risks.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        While I agree, these laws aren’t being made because smokers keep accidentally smoking near others, it’s because a large number of smokers can’t be assed to keep their distance. The major place I notice smokers is when they are just meandering through a large crowd as if everyone around them is fine with the smoke.

        • PattyP@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I get that, but shouldn’t it be possible then to target that kind of behavior specifically rather than all smoking? Rather than banning smoking on x beach or in y park, they could ban smoking within x meters of a minor or non consenting adult. It would be more complicated but also more fair.

          Ultimately I don’t know what all of the problems with that approach would be, but it would make more sense to me.