• Susurrus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    You could say smoking is one of the most human activities ever. Does nothing but actively harm and potentially kill everything around you. Just what we’re the best at.

    But seriously now. Can we speed up smoking bans? Like, everywhere?

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      But seriously now. Can we speed up smoking bans? Like, everywhere?

      Some European countries, including mine, has decided to raise the smoking age by 1 every year, essentially banning the next generation from smoking. Not really rapid or speeding up, but future is looking good

      There was a slight problem where some people were allowed to smoke for portion of the year after birthday and before the age increase, for every year

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        That I can’t get on board with personally. Everyone has a vice.

        Imagine doing that with cannabis or drinking. Probably wouldn’t get near the support even though those are also vices.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Second hand drinking isn’t really a thing and I don’t see people smoking weed publicly all the time to the point it’s disgusting to eat at cafe, at least never noticed it, so most don’t really care.

          • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s irrelevant. You’re telling people what they can and cannot do based on when they were born.

            It’d be one thing if no one could smoke. But youre not saying that. You’re strictly saying because you were born after x date that you can never smoke.

            That’s entirely messed up and my point being it’s terribly against personal freedom.

            And you basically proved my point- people will make allowances for other vices but not this.

            • REDACTED@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Note that I was telling what the government does, not what is my opinion on this.

              If I was steering the wheel, I’d just ban all drug consumption in public spaces, but allow non-destructive ones in personal spaces (your property), which includes tobacco and weed. I’d probably also limit the alcohol limit in drinks to something like 11%, so no absolut vodkas or smirnoffs as those tends to cause serious brain damage, which in return affects everyone around who have to deal with your vegetable state even when sober

              Disclaimer: I’m from east europe and alcohol consumption is kinda out of control for most people (yes, most people according to my experience)