• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    There are a lot of smells that you are expected to deal with, it seems like kind of a reach. I consider most parfums thoroughly unpleasant but I dont expect it to be made illegal.

    That being said, I’m okay with this because of the littering aspect.

    • SW42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      The smell of perfume doesn’t cause cancer. Second-hand smoke is proven to do so.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        You must have a hard time being anywhere close to a car if you think you are getting cancer because of a 2 second wiff from some guys cig on a beach. Seems like exaggeration, cancer isnt some lightning bolt that hits you the moment you get a hint of something bad near you.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          cancer isnt some lightning bolt that hits you the moment you get a hint of something bad near you.

          You’re correct, it isn’t a lightning bolt. This goes against your statement, not with it. It’s an accumulation of increased risk, and eventually it just happens (or doesn’t). The more things that increase your risk the higher the odds. You don’t just get cancer because someone smoked near you. You have an increased risk of cancer based on how much you’ve been around your entire life, and everything else that contributes. Reducing risk means reducing as many contributors as possible.

          You must have a hard time being anywhere close to a car if you think you are getting cancer because of a 2 second wiff from some guys cig on a beach.

          One thing is bad, so we can’t do anything about another thing? “People are being killed by cars, but we can’t work to reduce that because people are dying from heart disease!” How silly.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            The impact from those few odd times someone is smoking near you in an open areas is not proportional to the risk you are attributing to it imo. I am bringing up cars to highlight that.

            • Soggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Less exposure to smoking also makes some people less likely to take up smoking, as its presence isn’t so normalized. So that’s a lesser burden on medical infrastructure and fewer sources of secondhand smoke. Wins all around.

        • SW42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Cars don’t make me choke, but good point! I’d ban them from the cities as well.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes, we need to ban cars as well, pretty much all internal combustion. Unfortunately there are technical reasons that will take a while, but we’re making progress. Even worse my country has turned it political with regressives gleefully trying to turn back what progress we’ve made

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh FFS, yeah, cancer for people living in the same house. Getting a whiff of cigarette smoke isn’t doing jack shit to you.