andybytes@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · il y a 4 joursThe New York Times Just Published Some Bizarre Race Science About Asian Womenfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1340arrow-down117
arrow-up1323arrow-down1external-linkThe New York Times Just Published Some Bizarre Race Science About Asian Womenfuturism.comandybytes@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · il y a 4 joursmessage-square106fedilink
minus-squarenondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down4·il y a 4 joursNeither did China until Apple trained them
minus-squareshalafi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·il y a 4 joursShenzen’s supply chain is hardly all on Apple’s behalf or behest.
minus-squareRowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·il y a 4 joursSo 20-25 years from now we can be in the same place?
minus-squarenondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·il y a 4 joursWe? Not unless the entire government decided to fundamentally change overnight. The US government would never tell conglomerates what to do, it takes it’s orders from them.
minus-squarethemurphy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-2il y a 4 joursYes. But also the labour thing. Like alot.
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·il y a 4 joursWhile being subsidized by the tax code to do so🤡
Neither did China until Apple trained them
Shenzen’s supply chain is hardly all on Apple’s behalf or behest.
So 20-25 years from now we can be in the same place?
We? Not unless the entire government decided to fundamentally change overnight. The US government would never tell conglomerates what to do, it takes it’s orders from them.
Yes. But also the labour thing. Like alot.
While being subsidized by the tax code to do so🤡