• merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    misleading title

    The International Criminal Court ’s chief prosecutor has lost access to his email, and his bank accounts have been frozen.

    The Hague-based court’s American staffers have been told that if they travel to the U.S. they risk arrest.

    Some nongovernmental organizations have stopped working with the ICC and the leaders of one won’t even reply to emails from court officials.

    Those are just some of the hurdles facing court staff since U.S. President Donald Trump in February slapped sanctions on its chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, according to interviews with current and former ICC officials, international lawyers and human rights advocates.

    did Microsoft also freeze his bank accounts?

    this is the title ☞ “President Donald Trump in February slapped sanctions on its chief prosecutor, Karim Khan”

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is a technology forum. If the article is relevant here at all, it’s because of Microsoft. A better argument could probably be made that the article shouldn’t be here.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        It is relevant because Microsoft is shutting down people their accounts for prosecuting war crimes. This should be a wakeup call for people to stop using services by the Fascist American government.

        • frostysauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          stop using services by the Fascist American government.

          Microsoft is not part of the US government.

              • mcv@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                And those laws currently serve to suppress the international rule of law, and to enable fascism.

                Why would you possibly think this is no big deal, when you see the size of the deal right in front of you?

                US companies are subservient to Trump and will hurt you when Trump demands that.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          And here I am having to oversee our organisation moving to Windows 11. I would happily not do that but I cannot imagine trying to administer a network of Linux computed.

          • deathbird@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m not even sure what the Linux equivalent of Active Directory is. That’s the one I’m stumped by.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t think there is one I think the only way to do that would be to wander around with a bunch of .iso files and install what is needed where. At that point I think I’d rather just deal with Microsoft.

      • Michal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The title is still misleading and should have been worded better. Also company complying with sanctions is not news. The only reason it’d be newsworthy is if Microsoft locked his account independently.

        • mcv@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, the fact that MS can and will be forced to shut down accounts of people Trump dislikes is newsworthy in itself, and warning for everybody to avoid entrusting US companies with your data or money. If they can do it to this guy, they can do it to anyone.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That’s not newsworthy because it’s nothing new or unexpected. “US companies obey US law” isn’t newsworthy.

            • mcv@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Are you intentionally trying to miss the point? Don’t you think it matters what the law is? Harmful laws are absolutely newsworthy. Your data not being safe in the biggest data platforms in the world is absolutely newsworthy. I don’t understand how you can be so apathetic about that.

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                That’s not new though. Since 2020 the Biden government was forcing multiple social media sites to censor accounts and posts and to force through an agenda, and the people who are complaining over this were likely the ones who had no issue with that - because it was their “side” doing the censoring. Those of us who did call it out WHILE IT WAS HAPPENING were called conspiracy theorists, told we were spreading “misinformation”, and so on. You didn’t care then, why now?

                Your data not being safe in the biggest data platforms in the world is absolutely newsworthy.

                What do you mean by “data not being safe”? Losing access to your email? Any “data” that you have in a third party service isn’t “safe”, this isn’t new and it isn’t news.

                I don’t understand how you can be so apathetic about that.

                Because it’s been this way since the start of the internet and it’s not going to change. Companies can ban people. Governments can force companies to ban people. Governments keep passing new laws to enable them to control speech and the narrative online because they know that the mainstream media that they control is going the way of the dodo. Those of us who have been fighting against it for well over a decade at this point are over it because the people crying about it now were the same people calling for it for the last 4 years, asking for the government and social media companies to ban everyone they disagree with. You asked for it, you begged for it, now you’ve got it.

                • mcv@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  “Those of us who”? Dude, you’re here encouraging apathy and arguing this is nothing special. You’re not fighting for anything, and now you want to pretend you’re the one fighting the good fight here?

                  I’ve been fighting for these issues for decades. Many have. You don’t see us arguing that “none of this is newsworthy”. It makes our news every single time.

                  You’re doing a poor job living up to that username of yours.