no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 个月前Were you aware?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1430arrow-down118
arrow-up1412arrow-down1imageWere you aware?lemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 个月前message-square15fedilink
minus-squareyesman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up39arrow-down3·1 个月前I called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
minus-squarescholar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up45·1 个月前Napoleon the emperor who tried to conquer Europe and nearly succeeded is more famous than the fictional character so that makes sense
minus-squareJackGreenEarth@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·1 个月前Anecdotal evidence is so strong! There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down4·1 个月前… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
minus-squaresolsangraal@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 个月前i get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
minus-squareBlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 个月前Sounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
I called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
Napoleon the emperor who tried to conquer Europe and nearly succeeded is more famous than the fictional character so that makes sense
Anecdotal evidence is so strong!
There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
i get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
At least one person gets the joke
Sounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
thatsthejoke.zip