no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 month agoWere you aware?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1430arrow-down118
arrow-up1412arrow-down1imageWere you aware?lemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 month agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squareyesman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up39arrow-down3·1 month agoI called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
minus-squarescholar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up45·1 month agoNapoleon the emperor who tried to conquer Europe and nearly succeeded is more famous than the fictional character so that makes sense
minus-squareJackGreenEarth@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·1 month agoAnecdotal evidence is so strong! There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down4·1 month ago… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
minus-squaresolsangraal@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 month agoi get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
minus-squareBlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoSounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
I called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
Napoleon the emperor who tried to conquer Europe and nearly succeeded is more famous than the fictional character so that makes sense
Anecdotal evidence is so strong!
There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
i get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
At least one person gets the joke
Sounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
thatsthejoke.zip