You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

  • Matombo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    PS.: With the current trend we will find out in about the next decade if the safeguards work …

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Decade? More like 3 months. He’s already doing wildly unconstitutional things. If the Supreme Court refuses to take on challenges to it or outright approves it, well, they didn’t work.

    • Hupf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Ich sage: nieder mit diesen Gesetzen!

      Macht Deutschland wieder Groß

      You mean that way, approximately?