• Revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    2 days ago

    7 websites, Jellyfin for 6 people, Nextcloud, CRM for work, email server for 3 domains, NAS, and probably some stuff I’ve forgotten on a $4 computer from a tiny thrift store in BFE Kansas. I’d love to upgrade, but I’m always just filled with joy whenever I think of that little guy just chugging along.

      • Revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        It does fine. It’s an i5-6500 running CPU transcoding only. Handles 2-3 concurrent 1080p streams just fine. Sometimes there’s a little buffering if there’s transcoding going on. I try to keep my files at 1080p for storage reasons though. This thing’s not going to handle 4k transcoding very well, but it does okay if you don’t expect too much from it.

        • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m skeptical that you are doing much video transcoding anyway. 1080p is supported on must devices now, and h264 is best buddies with 1080p content - a codec supported even on washing machines. Audio may be transcoded more often.

          • Revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Not a huge amount of transcoding happening, but some for old Chromecasts and some for low bandwidth like when I was out of the country a few weeks ago watching from a heavily throttled cellular connection. Most of my collection is h264, but I’ve got a few h265 files here and there. I am by no means recommending my setup as ideal, but it works okay.

            • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Absolutely, whatever works for you. I think its awesome to use the cheapest hardware possible to do these things. Being able to use a media server without transcoding capabilities? Brilliant. I actually thought you’d probably be able to get away with no transcoding at all since 1080p has native support on most devices and so does h264. In the rare cases, you could transcode beforehand (like with a script whenever a file is added) so you’d have an appropriate format on hand when needed.

          • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Most of my content is h265 and av1 so I assume they are also facing a similar issue. I usually use the jellyfin app on PC or laptop so not an issue but my family members usually use the old TV which doesn’t support it.

            • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              AV1 is definitely a showstopper a lot of the time indeed. H265 I would expect to see more on 2k or 4k content (though native support is really high anyway). My experience so far has been seeing transcoding done only becuase the resolution is unsupported when I try watching 4k videos on an older 1080p only chromecast.

              • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                What do you mean by showstopper? I only encode my shows into AV1/opus and I never had any transcoding happening on any of my devices.

                It’s well supported on any recent Browser compared to x264/x265… specially 10bit encodes. And software decoding is nearly present on any recent device.

                Dunno about 4k though, I haven’t the necessary screen resolution to play any 4k content… But for 1080p, AV1 is the way to go IMO.

                • Free open/source
                • Any browser supported
                • Better compression
                • Same objective quality with lower bitrate
                • A lot of cool open source project arround AV1

                It has it’s own quirks for sure (like every codec) but it’s far from a bad codec. I’m not a specialist on the subject but after a few months of testing/comparing/encoding… I settled with AV1 because it was comparative better than x264/x265.

                • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Showstopper in the sense that it may not play natively and require transcoding. While x264 has pretty much universal support, AV1 does not… at least not on some of my devices. I agree that it is a good encoder and the way forward but its not the best when using older devices. My experience has been with Chromecast with Google TV. Looks like google only added AV1 support in their newest Google TV Streamer (late 2024 device).

      • Revv@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        EspoCRM. I really like it for my purposes. I manage a CiviCRM instance for another job that needs more customization, but for basic needs, I find espo to be beautiful, simple, and performant.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sweeeeet thank you! Demo looks great. Now to figure out whether an uber n00ber can self host it in a jiffy or not. 🙏