cm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前Oh well...lemmy.mlimagemessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up11.16Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1imageOh well...lemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square129fedilink
minus-squareQueen HawlSera@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 年前Yeah, but it can’t be in direct retalliation, it must be based on work performance. Normally the former is hard to prove, but sometimes it’s obvious.
minus-squarechiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 年前That’s simply not accurate in 49 out of 50 states. Basically, you can be fired for any reason aside from membership in a protected class. But if you are terminated without cause, you can collect unemployment, which the further employer is required to pay.
Yeah, but it can’t be in direct retalliation, it must be based on work performance. Normally the former is hard to prove, but sometimes it’s obvious.
That’s simply not accurate in 49 out of 50 states.
Basically, you can be fired for any reason aside from membership in a protected class.
But if you are terminated without cause, you can collect unemployment, which the further employer is required to pay.