Dot.@feddit.org to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoScheme to cast votes on stolen mail ballots thwarted by Colorado election officials.coloradosun.comexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1452arrow-down15
arrow-up1447arrow-down1external-linkScheme to cast votes on stolen mail ballots thwarted by Colorado election officials.coloradosun.comDot.@feddit.org to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squareammonium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down36·1 year agoWhich is why we don’t do vote by mail ¯_(ツ)_/¯
minus-squareSmilingSolaris@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·1 year agoI love how when a scheme like this fails people like you act like it succeeded in your rhetoric. Very silly billy ain’t ya
minus-squareammonium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down7·1 year agoAt the cost of voter anonymity, which shows exactly what is wrong with voting by mail. It’s impossible to prevent fraud while preserving anonymity. Not silly billy at all.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 year agoWhy? Safeguards preventing fraud worked here. Your comment doesn’t make sense in relation to the story you filed it under
minus-squareammonium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·1 year agoThey prevented fraud at the cost of voter anonymity, this is exactly what is wrong with voting by mail. You cannot protect both.
minus-squareSubverb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down9·1 year agoOne success at thwarting fraud doesn’t mean that all attempts are thwarted though, it only proves that fraud is happening. That’s the problem.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 year agoNo instances of being thwarted doesn’t mean it’s not happening. Just means it’s successful
Which is why we don’t do vote by mail ¯_(ツ)_/¯
I love how when a scheme like this fails people like you act like it succeeded in your rhetoric. Very silly billy ain’t ya
At the cost of voter anonymity, which shows exactly what is wrong with voting by mail. It’s impossible to prevent fraud while preserving anonymity. Not silly billy at all.
deleted by creator
Why?
Safeguards preventing fraud worked here. Your comment doesn’t make sense in relation to the story you filed it under
They prevented fraud at the cost of voter anonymity, this is exactly what is wrong with voting by mail. You cannot protect both.
One success at thwarting fraud doesn’t mean that all attempts are thwarted though, it only proves that fraud is happening. That’s the problem.
No instances of being thwarted doesn’t mean it’s not happening. Just means it’s successful