NixOS’ influence and importance at pushing Linux forward into the (previously) unexplored landscape of configuring your complete system through a single config file is undeniable. It’s been a wild ride, but it was well worth it.

And although it has only been relatively recently that it has lost its niche status, the recent influx of so-called ‘immutable’ distros springing up like mushrooms is undeniably linked to and inspired by NixOS.

However, unfortunately, while this should have been very exciting times for what’s yet to come, the recent drama surrounding the project has definitely tarnished how the project is perceived.

NixOS’ ideas will definitely live on regardless. But how do you envision NixOS’ own future? Any ETA’s for when this drama will end? Which lessons have we learned (so far) from this drama? Are there any winners as a result of this drama? Could something like this happen to any distro?


In case you’re out of the loop. Though, there’s a lot that has transpired since but which hasn’t been rigorously documented at a single place; like how 4 out of 5 NixOS board members have quit over the last 2 months or so.

  • refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    IMO politics have no place in technical discussions. Full disclosure, the last time I said this, my comment was removed for “transphobia”… somehow.

    • macaroni1556@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What you call politics (US political “issues”) and politicking (the act of seeking and organizing power or influence) are different things.

      Maybe US political issues have no spot in tech but politics are a part of being human.

    • SMillerNL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Building an open source project is not just a technical challenge. It’s a social one as well, and politics are a big factor in that.