• sarcasticsunrise@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Here we go again and again on this repeat episode of Hold Your Nose And Vote For Joe Where as Joe is enacting and upholding protections for the LGBTQ community, Trump is only too happy to repeal that shit so fast. Not only that, but big boi Trump also has alluded to glassing Iran, which is way further than Biden has escalated towards. Biden is sadly, our current cold comfort here. We’re stuck between a rock and a slightly more malleable corrupt WW3 causing dipshit rock

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The more people vote for the left, the further left their position will become. It’s a well established component of political theory called the Overton window.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The problem is that there isn’t a left to vote for, you either vote for right or far-right. That’s why the ratchet effect exists, both parties are right wing, just separated in how extreme they are, with the Reps being overt fascists.

        Actual leftist change is not going to come from voting for liberals. Absolutely vote for Biden if you wish, this isn’t an argument against voting for him. However, if you think voting for a right winger will shift the overton window to the left, you don’t understand the nuances of the overton window.

        Actual leftist change comes from direct action and organizing. Strikes, mutual aid, canvassing, raising class awareness, spreading leftist theory, protesting, actual outside pressure is what changes the overton window.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The problem is that there isn’t a left to vote for

          In the current American political spectrum, there isn’t really anything that most other countries would recognize as “left”.

          But given the current binary reality, whatever the Democrats are is viewed as left of the GOP rightwingnuts.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Please reread my comment. The Democrats are less right wing than the Republicans, yes, but voting for them signals more liberalism, not more leftism.

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          If there’s a spectrum between left and right, then there’s a point on that spectrum in the center of how the populace feels. If you have two major parties they will naturally arrange themselves immediately to the left and the right of that point. They have to in order to gather up as many undecideds as possible - they will naturally win everyone further left or further right who is not an idiot.

          Voting moves this center point along the spectrum. The ratchet effect pulls to the right only because that’s the trajectory over the last few decades. If the trajectory was to the left in recent decades the inverse would be true.

          Direct action and organising might also move the center point along the spectrum, but not as much as voting, and only if voting reflects the results of direct action.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            None of that is actual analysis, it’s all vibes-based. The parties will serve those that fund them.

            • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Actually it’s well established and well understood political science, ironically you’re just rejecting it as “vibes-based” because you don’t like the vibe.

              Yes political donations are a problem, but the inescapable fact is, the more people that vote for the dems, the more they will move to the left.

              Sadly, your position is precisely that which conservative proponents would have you adopt. Well done.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                No, the Dems will never become Socialist, as they would lose funding and thus power. It takes a lot to run a party, after all.

                Leftist change has always happened thanks to outside pressure.

                I’m not telling you not to vote, I’m telling you voting will never be enough.

                • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Well… it’s true that the dems “will never become socialist” due to voting but it’s also true that America will never become socialist due to activism.

                  Socialism to any meaningful extent is not achievable in the foreseeable.

                  Voting is the most efficacious method by which to effect meaningful change.

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    America can only become Socialist due to activism and outside pressure, and likely will over time as Capitalism declines. Voting won’t make it happen.