• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Weirder? Sure.

    What gives you the idea that eating animal meat is unintentional?

    I can think of plenty of examples of one animal eating the meat of another, but only one example of a majority of a species drinking the breast milk of another species.

    So yeah, drinking milk seems weirder to me than eating meat.

    • I dont know man. Ants are farming aphids for their sugary digestive secrets aka their shit. Bears eat Honey, which to all logic remains half digested bee-spit. Praying Mantis cut off the head off their mate after mating and eat it. Anglerfish males are not the mighty toothed beasts, but weird little parasites that nist themselves in the females and eat them from the inside until the female just lays its eggs before death.

      So humans drinking other animals milk is maybe unique, but certainly not more weird than other ways of procurung nutrition, that nature invented.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t think anyone claimed drinking the breast milk of other species is the weirdest thing on the planet, but I’m not sure your examples quite hit that level, although ants and aphids is a point.

        I guess the counterpoint is that aphid secretions are nontoxic and largely sugar, while humans have fancy coffee that’s made from beans extracted from actual cat s***, and the cat s*** coffee farms are a lot weirder and more gross than an aphid farm.

        But bee honey is just dried out nectar, it isn’t even spit or vomit because there’s no bile or added secretions. It’s just dehydrated flower juice.

        As for the angler fish and praying mantis, that doesn’t seem strange at all with so many ways that evolution and reproduction have evolved.

        Milk isn’t some instinctual thing, humans know where milk comes from, know the cow has to be pregnant, and know which baby animals milk is for, and chose to build an industry around artificially impregnating cows year round, sucking the moo juice from their swollen breasts, taking away their babies after they’re born and processing them for food, then artificially impregnating the agitated mother and sucking more juice out of her for a few years until she’s worthless as a moojuice producer and is moodered for our consumption. Then there’s the hormones that we used for decades and the terrible conditions the animals live in.

        Factory farming, artificial insemination and separating families are choices that we are making to enjoy the elite privilege of drinking the lactation of other species.

        That’s still way weirder to me.

        • Milk isn’t some instinctual thing, humans know where milk comes from, know the cow has to be pregnant, and know which baby animals milk is for, and chose to build an industry around …

          Neither is bread, beer, pizza or any other processed food. Think about it, how weird it is, that humans decided to take seeds, that they cannot digest well and isntead of letting the seeds just seed, they grind them with stones and then they add water and they let it spoil and then they take the spoiled bunch and put it over a fire. And of course it couldnt stop there no! they all started to make it in different ways and when they imagined some standarized symbols they added these symbols together to describe how to do it. And they learned how to breed the seeds so they get more of the white fluffy stuff and they started playing with the dirt to dirigate water to where the seeds grow. And then they noticed the seeds to grow better when they put animal shit on them, so they did that too. And then they used the little symbols they invented, to measure how much seeds each human is growing and how much seeds they need to give to the alpha-humans and some of these alpha humans got so rich with seeds, they built themselves giant gravestones, that are still among the largest buildings to this day.

          You can describe anything that humans did since they stopped slapping bunnies with stone and collecting roots as being super weird. I share your criticism of industrialized farming, but not because it is less or more weird, but because it is detrimental to our survival and well being.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Breaking things down to their fundamentals isn’t weird, the thing itself is weird.

            No, the development of crops is not weird. Bread is likewise not weird. Capitalism, or the hoarding of resources, is more detrimental to humans than crops or bread, but not very weird.

            Developing an industry around humans harvesting the non-essential lactation of other species meant for animal babies is much weirder than bread.

            Bread - grind seeds, add flour, add water, add heat

            Hunting rabbits - kill rabbit, process meat, add heat

            Potatoes - grow potatoes, harvest potatoes, add heat

            Milk - forcefully inseminate animals, confine the animals in filth, pump them full of chemicals and hormones, secure the cow lactation for the pleasure of the percentage of the human population that can digest cow milk instead of the animal babies it’s intended for, boil the milk because it’s dangerous for humans, kill the baby once it’s born, ignore the bleating and stress of the cow, pump them full of chemicals and hormones, artificially inseminate the cow, repeat

            Milk is definitely weirder.

            • You just arbitrarily define your level of detail.

              Drinking milk also just started as:

              try milk from lactating cow - realize you are able to digest it - get more milk from that cow.

              All the rest that lead to most Europeans being lactose tolerant, which is an insane genetical success story and the subsequent refining of that process came later.

              But maybe to help you with the seeds: A common way of breeding new seeds, that isnt specific GMO, is to radiate the seeds for random mutation. How is the following process not weird? “apply death ray to seed, get defeberated seed, see if it has any useful properties, crossbreed degenerated seed with less degenerated one until you get your right mix of degeneracy”

              Or should we go about processing old dinosaur meat into transparent wrappings to buy our cow lactate in? Name it and i can tell you how it is weird. The process is just creative and the result is arbitrary.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re literally doing what you’re accusing others of in order to make inorganic sterile processes sound strange.

                I’m not arbitrarily defining my level of detail, you can break down bread as much as you want and use as many dramatic or inaccurate terms as you like, but bread is never going to be as weird as artificially inseminating chemical hormone pumped eugenics cows so that we can steal their baby juice. I don’t need to make euphemisms or make things sound more dramatic - that’s actually what’s happening.

                You’re pretending that radiation is weird when it’s literally everywhere constantly, and using the word crossbreeds to falsely equivocate eugenics and hormonal manipulation in higher life forms with retaining the seeds of successful fruiting plants.

                I understand you’re upset that you can’t make milk less weird, but pushing for grains to be weird is not a winning route for you.

                • Your weirdness with milk stems from it being from a mammal and you seeing more similarity with a mammal. But the underlying processes are equally estranged from the perceived natural way. and for the natural way again the definition remains difficult, because humans 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000, 10.000 and 50.000 years ago all had very different lifes in which very different things happened.

                  What you described with artifical hormones is something of the past 50 years. But what about the other 6.000 years of humans drinking milk already? What you describe isnt specific to milk.It is specific to modern industrialized countries.

                  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    The original weirdness comes from thousands of years that humans saw these other animals with their animal boobs dripping milk into the mouths of their babies, and decided that we need some of that non-essential nourishment at any cost.

                    That’s why it’s weird. And it only gets weirder when we have to build up industrialized processes to support an obviously unsustainable and harmful process because…the percentage of the population who can stomach the non-essential infant cow juice want it so badly?

                    That weirdness has been happening as long as we’ve been stealing milk from cow babies.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because you alleged that meat is not something I was intended to eat, which doesn’t really track with the uncountable natural examples of predator and prey for all of knowable history.