I hate that everything now is a subscription service instead of buying it and do whatever you want.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article said the subscription was for “software updates” which really seems like something they should provide for free anyway so you’re really just paying for the privilege to use their precious machine that you already paid for lol

      • Clocksstriking13@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s for “smart” washing machines that you can control from your phone etc. So that’s likely what the “updates” would be related too…why you’d need to control your washing machine from afar is beyond me but some people love smart gadgets and will by anything that connects to their phone.

        • mayo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are cases for it, eg programming a wash to occur when energy demand is low.

          In my opinion we should be pursuing technologies to do this that don’t require an internet connection. Even being able to program a schedule into the machine and it can detect if something is in there or not. That would be enough since energy usage follows a relatively consistent plot. These companies don’t give a shit about anything other than coming up with ways to make more money.

          • Gork@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The cost of the laundry subscription is likely to vastly out cost the energy savings it may provide.