Here’s a non-paywalled link to an article published in the Washington Post a few days ago. It’s great to see this kind of thing getting some mainstream attention. Young children have not made an informed decision about whether they want their photos posted online.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have not posted a single photo of my kids on any platform for this reason. My wife on the other hand thinks I’m overly paranoid, so thanks to her, Zuck has a ton of photos of them…

  • root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I recently found out about Circles and was hoping to migrate friends and family to it, but it’s just too much of a learning curve to get things set up.

    • tuckerm@supermeter.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That looks cool, I hadn’t heard of Circles before. I want to check it out now. I’m curious if it somehow keeps your data private from the server owner. That feels like the missing feature in most federated, privacy-focused social networks.

      Side note: looks like it’s made by Futo; I hadn’t realized they were working on something like that. I’ve been using another one of their apps, Grayjay for almost all of my mobile Youtube viewing lately. It works great.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I really hope it becomes the new normal to stop posting everything about ourselves non-anonymously online in general. But especially photos and information about kids. I am hopeful that in the near future, we’ll all look back and say “What the fuck were we thinking? We all looked like narcissists exploiting our kids for likes!”

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s plenty of reasons to want to share images of your offspring besides chasing internet clout, and I find that simplification ignores all but the narcisistic fame chasers that will never care anyway.

      Not making any judgement on whether any other reason is particularly valid. Just saying that the people who do it for likes are never going to see it as anything negative or exploitative. Better off talking with or working to stop the people oversharing for other reasons. Higher chance of success.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        There’s plenty of reasons to want to share images of your offspribg besides chasing internet clout.

        … I can only think of one, sharing photos with your family and a few select friends.

        What other reasons are there?