The names of previous Lemmy versions were all very boring and repetetive. We need something much more creative. Any ideas?

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Eh, if someone on the team is feeling creative I don’t mind fun version numbers but semantic versioning is quite searchable and reduces confusion.

    • Shatur@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      One does not exclude the other. You can have a fancy name and a semantic versioning.

      • Tanoh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The problem is that it is almost always just one lf them. Let’s say that v0.20 is called “Fuck Spez” and v0.21 is called “YouKnowWhatFuckMuskToo”.

        Most people are going to refer to them by either the number or the name, almost never are both used. The biggest problem with names is that they are rarely sortable (google did it with android, for a bit but not anymore), so in the future it is hard to know which is which without resorting to looking at a list of releases.

        For example, in the future when we are on v0.30 someone might say “ah, but this has been an issue since “Fuck Spez”.” And then most likely you have to look it up to know what they are talking about. If we coulld force everyone to alwaya write “version “Fuck Spez” (v0.20)” then it would be great, but that never happens.

        I personally prefer just semantic versioning for this reason.

        • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          What if the names were picked from whatever news was prominent during the release week. During last summer we could have had something like blackout or APIcalypse.