• kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There are always people being nuts. This feels more like more effort to muddy the conversation about the actual issues with AI

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Even though this is obviously anthropic marketing bait, I thought it was still funny

    • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There is/has been a cult of dumbassess who think they’re creating a digital god for many years now

      Google “rationalists” or “zizians”

      It’s not really good marketing, imo, to show everyone that you hire insane morons.

    • Shindo66@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’ve been saying this for at least 20 years now. When the computer can program a better computer it will be a god.

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    AI development has a few factions. People that want to make and fuck their AI daughter/girlfriend. Researchers that want to underatand the basis of the human mind. Capitalists that want to convert human intelligence into capital they can fully own (slavery is the first attempt). Then finally cultists that want to make God in their image.

    It’s a crazy field for someone that is fascinated by thinking about thinking and want to make useful little tools.

    • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Faction 5: The mathematicians who want to find new shortcuts for large matrix operations so we can apply it to other fields…

      • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Oh true! It’s funny talking some data sci folks that are just “I didnt need GPUs but now I might as well optimize for them now” because they’re org has tons of that compute now for “AI”

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      It’s not real though. It’s part of their stupid guerilla psyslop marketing. They’re trying to pump the bubble.

      • mysticalone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        have you met people? i would give this the benefit of the doubt. 5 years until humans start crusades for AI against AI. lots of “Grok spoke to me of the evils of Claude”

        “Saint Altman of the nude pics”

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    This is easily the least scary and convincing analogue horror series ever.

    Just give it up.

  • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    ·
    2 days ago

    All the evidence for this comes from a linked article that says only

    To add to the drama, a wild rumour, and I stress rumour, is doing the rounds in San Francisco: some Anthropic engineers have begun to worship Claude.

    Can we really get nothing more substantive than that?

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      A lot of it was also connected to misinterpreting some friends’ performance art as an official event like JD Vance did the other week.

      Journalism in any way touching ‘AI’ is so bad that it’d probably end up better actually being written by AI. The human hallucination rates for the topic domain are going off the charts hunting for confirmation bias clicks.

      • Thorry@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Meh I’d argue journalism has always been this way.

        In the past it was more separated perhaps. We had the front page of the paper for breaking news, then the next few pages for in depth articles, there was the whole sports section etc. But there was often also a gossip section with news about celebs, there were the comics, general knowledge and background pieces and often fluff based on rumors. Some papers opted to be more serious and not include such things, often made by a printing house that also made straight up tabloids. Some papers focused exclusively on financial stuff for example. But even back then we also had our magazines and tabloids, some of better quality, most of lesser quality.

        These days with websites it’s become more common to just have everything on the same website and have the users figure out what they want or don’t want to read. I’ve seen sites that usually post nothing but fluff and summaries of other peoples work, sometimes put out excellent articles with a lot of own research and sources. Often written by experts in their fields. But in order to fund those pieces, they need a lot of filler to keep the views and money coming in. Having just a little bit of info, like a rumor and writing an article about it has been an important skill since at least the 80s.

        It’s easy to point out the lower quality as an example of how shit the world is, but I can tell you from first hand experience we had some shit journalism back in the 80s as well. There were certain kinds of newspapers that were known for that lower quality. What newspapers you were subscribed to said something about you as a person and your place in society. Often people who read only the serious stuff looked down on the common folk with their rag newspapers. And the people who read the more common papers looked at those people who only read the financial stuff for example as boring and stuffy.

  • CalemitousVariantK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    I could see a bunch of programmers scamming a journo into believing this story, but would have expected an editor to catch it. Unless they’ve all been replaced with LLMs.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Well they do have the plan to make some AI that knows everything and makes decisions for humanity and builds new inventions at record pace.

    They love their transhumanism. I’m so happy I’m 51 and I expect to be very old when shit really hits the fan. Still think the 1990s was peak humanity.

    • agit68@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I think of the 90’s as us trying to continue the optimism and work that was put in during the 60’s to create a more egalitarian society, while having some of the wild of the 70’s and trying to recover from Reaganism of the 80’s. And not having the daily threat of nuclear annihilation. While allowing the rise of unbridled corporatism.

      While Clinton did a lot of work to balance the budget and had the debt paid off, he also passed the telecommunications act of 93 that allowed consolidation of media. Namely I heart radio.

      Before him cable providers were required to allow public access, and only 1 owner of a single am/fm (pick one.) station with 1 television station in a market.

      Now you have Sinclair as a direct result.

          • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I know. I was pointing out that these people apparently worship it for it’s omniscience and intelligence, neither of which it has.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          other than the" christian one", most other non-christian gods are only powerful in thier aspect of that religion.

          • AmyAye@nord.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s really funny, something I learned very recently, is even in Christianity, God isn’t the only God. It is just apparently like “you are not allowed to worship any other gods.”

            So Christians basically act like he is the one and only.

            • Zahille7@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Which is reinforced by the fact the Bible hardly ever brings up any other deities/gods besides God. You have your named Angels and such, but that’s not the same.

              The more I hear about Christianity, despite going to church most of my youth, the more I realize I actually don’t really know that much (or may have forgotten it) about the religion’s lore aside from the Creation Myth.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s not better though. You can worship god all you want and he’s not gonna do anything bad because he’s not real. The same can’t be said for Claude. This could have Consequences.

    • veryblandusername@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a rumor from a guy who heard a thing from a dude who knows someone that overheard this other guy while walking past a hallway where two people happened to be speaking about something they read online.

      If you want to believe it, you’re free to do so, god have mercy on you though, you probably believe a lot of very stupid things.