I have been noting this more recently and it seems to be a trend, at least with people I converse with on the regular. The really religious types aren’t animal people or downright dont like them. The more chill or agnostic types seem to be more apt to love animals.

I could go on my theory of this but I’m interested to see if anyone thinks this is a trend.

  • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t think an animal’s life is of equal value to a human’s. I don’t think that’s a strictly religious view point either. Should they have shot harambe to save that kid, or was that action equivalent to murder?

    • Onyxonblack@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Typical creature that values it’s own species over all others. I really despise this mentality. Anyway have a great day.

      • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Should they have shot harambe or let it rip the kid in half? Is it your position that all organisms are of equal value?

          • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            What are the other options ? This is a binary discussion. A human life is of more impact and relevance than an animal’s. Therefore it’s value is higher. I have a ton of animals, farm and pet, I LOVE my animals. I’d put my girl’s life above all of them in a second.

            • Hawke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              For your first question: there is no certainty that Harambe would have “ripped the kid in half”.

              For your second, you could value some species more than your own and others less, there’s no reason all species must be equally valuable (let alone individuals) Although the idea of thinking about things that way at all is a little gross to me.

              • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                Is it genuinely your belief that the kid would have been fine? Or even any 100% safe solution outside of what happened? What was done ensured the safety of the human child, as it should have. You’re misusing false dichotomy. The user I was responding to stated

                “Typical creature that values it’s own species over all others.”

                The all or nothing aspect I gave is a direct response to the one they gave. The implication being the user does not value human life over all other life. I do, which is why this started and is ending as a binary conversation. Secondary to that, whats better than what in a tier list is completely irrelevant to the conversation.

    • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      You’re using too much logic for an emotional thread, lol.

      The people who are “animals over humans!!!” or equate them don’t love nor care for anybody besides themselves in earnest. They’ll stay in their little corner with their pets, shaking in fear just thinking about deep human connections until the day they die. 🤷‍♂️