• [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          The FBI quietly issued guidance this past spring lifting a categorical hiring ban on applicants who had previously engaged in prostitution, and said that it would instead consider the context of the behaviour in at least some cases. The bureau made a similar change regarding bestiality.

          "We did not want to punish victims of bestiality, victims who were trafficked. We did not want to make it an automatic disqualification for the FBI to consider you,” Patel said.

          If thay was what they meant they should have written about ‘not excluding victims of’ instead of ‘consider the context’.

          Thank you for the link!

          • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Well yeah. Just because you were abused as a pup, does not mean you can’t be a police dog. What justice is that?

          • Makeitstop@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            14 hours ago

            If that was actually the intent they could have avoided all the drama by adding broader language to the entire document allowing exceptions on a case by case basis for prohibited behaviors which occurred while the applicant was a victim of trafficking and coercion. This sounds a lot more like an excuse made after the fact to defend an indefensible decision.

            I really hope someone in congress follows up on this and demands to know how many agents were hired with these behaviors on their record, and of those how many had been identified as victims of trafficking. Make them go on record with it.