“You thought you’d get away with this. I am in your car. I am in your maps,” he shouted at her, according to the police records.

Over the coming days, Stacey found that the parental control profile, to which she had no access, could almost entirely control the car, including its speed, climate control, lock and curfew hours, determining when the car could be driven.

Between 6 and 12 November 2025, Pucci remotely alternated the car’s temperature setting between extremely cold and extremely hot.

“The victim has not been able to drive certain speeds and on most recent occasions throughout this period, [the accused] has turned on ‘Valet Mode’ which immediately reduces the speed to 40km per hour causing significant safety issues for the victim on the road”, the police documents stated.

“The victim has not had any control of her vehicle since she noticed the parental control profile added on the 1st November 2025.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Musk should have to write a check for $1 billion to her.

    I’m not kidding. That’s how we have to punish billionaires. Every infraction is a minimum $1 billion payout to each person.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’m with you. I wish we lived in a world where these rich bastards were being held meaningfully accountable.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s up to us. We have to force our representatives to enforce justice, or we will, and it will include those who denied us justice.

    • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Why? These are known useful features of the car. The guy changing the settings remotely is the criminal and she was too ignorant to disable his account. It’s like if you give your house keys to your stalker and find them illegally in your house then trying to sue the lock maker.

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Please explain how remotely limiting the speed of a vehicle is useful and not dangerous.

        The only “parental controls” you need are the keys.

        • minfapper@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          that feature is called “Valet mode”. It’s specifically to stop valets going joy-riding on your $150k car that was faster than most Ferraris back when that feature got added.

            • minfapper@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It offers both. But if you do it remotely from the owner’s phone, it doesn’t require the passcode. Presumably in case you forget the passcode you set in the car.

              And once you build the functionality to turn it off remotely, you may as well allow turning it on as well. For example, if you realize you forgot to enable valet mode shortly after handing over the keys, you can still do so.