• Dpek@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    In 2022 ukraine was a country that had fought sense 2014, which has had significant chunck taken over by russia ,unlike iraq, ukraine didnt have the money from oil exporting

    And ukraine wasnt given heavy weapons until well after the innitial attack was blunted, specificly because it was expected for ukraine to fall (also why it took soo long for ukraine to get western fighters, pilot training started during the war )

    Just the blunting of the innitial attacks meant that russias goal of repeating what happened with crimea were a failure

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      who was ukraine fighting since 2014? they were doing ethnic cleansing in the donbas and luhansk. you’re talking as if they were already in a protracted war or some shit. after the maidan coup ukraine started receiving cia training and money. so if anything they should have been better prepared. yes, russia annexed crimea, but the extent of the conflict wasn’t big enough to weaken ukraine after a prolonged battle or some shit. in 2022 ukraine was way better positioned for a war than in 2014. what was once fringe fascist groups with guns became a full fledged white supremacist battalion with proper military training and financing, the ethnic cleansing in the oblasts were the military training they needed in order to achieve this, it made them stronger, not weaker.

      on top of this, it’s more beneficial for russia to keep a protracted war with the us puppet state since this is what has been depleting us ammo and gear, which has been very beneficial for palestine, iran and yemen.

      • Dpek@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        So first off

        The main reason why i mentioned heavy weapons specificly despite ny innitial comment was because russia knows soviet equipment quite well

        All of ukraines tanks, airdefence, fighters, attackers, counterbattery

        Most of ukraines equipment was extremely well known by russia, what wasnt was in small numbers or lighter equipment

        who was ukraine fighting since 2014?

        As per mister putin “Зачем? Когда мы вынуждены, хочу подчеркнуть, вынуждены были защищать русскоязычное население на Донбассе, вынуждены были отреагировать на стремления людей, живущих в Крыму, вернуться в состав Российской Федерации”

        Quick translation “Why? When we were forced—I want to emphasize, forced—to protect the Russian-speaking population in Donbas, forced to respond to the aspirations of people living in Crimea to return to the Russian Federation.”

        So an insurgancy (or freedom fighters, doesnt make much of a diffrence here) supported by the russian goverment

        you’re talking as if they were already in a protracted war or some shit. after the maidan coup

        Dealing with an insurgency right after a coup

        Im fairly certain that falls into the “some shit” category

        More relevant to this is written later

        ukraine started receiving cia training and money. so if anything they should have been better prepared.

        CIA training? As in the central intelligence agency? They are an intel agency, not military advisors. And neither can do magic (like makeing soviet era leftover equipment to be anything else)

        Money by itself doesnt do much, corruption is a thing and what money is the easiest to steal other then the one that officialy doesnt exist

        For an example of how well cia training and money helps look at afganistan

        the ethnic cleansing in the oblasts were the military training they needed in order to achieve this, it made them stronger, not weaker.

        Really?

        Not even claiming its fighting an insurgency but specificly “ethnic cleansing”?

        I call bs

        in 2022 ukraine was way better positioned for a war than in 2014.

        Just how low of a bar that is was a big reason i mentioned ukraine in the first place

        90s and early 00s were dealing with the soviet collapse for the eastern block

        And then a horrific military situation and not exactly good economic situation, a coup, insurgancy and part of the country being invaded being placed ontop

        PanArab@lemmy.ml didnt talk about wether iraq was in a better position a decade prior but rather things that effected their position at the start of the war

        on top of this, it’s more beneficial for russia to keep a protracted war with the us puppet state since this is what has been depleting us ammo and gear, which has been very beneficial for palestine, iran and yemen.

        1.What does this have to do with the 2022 invasion? (And thus earlier comments)

        2.This war has had significant effects on russia, at the very least loss of trust due to russias failure to defend its fellow CSTO member Armenia in 2023

        3.Ukraine isnt useing much of ammunition for americas systems

        America is with its inefficensy

        4.Russia has done the exact oposite it has given europe and america the perfect testing ground to develop counters and counterparts to what hamas, the houthis and iran are all use

        Let alone rather clearly demonstrating why such systems should be developed

        If it wasnt for russia then america and all of the middle east would be starting from scratch and/or heavly reliant on guess who? Israel (as they are one of the few that have had to defend against semi regular significantly sized rocket barrages)

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          56 minutes ago

          CIA training? As in the central intelligence agency? They are an intel agency, not military advisors. And neither can do magic (like makeing soviet era leftover equipment to be anything else)

          The phoenix program, what’s that?